Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:55:30.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thickness Effects on the Magnetic Hysteresis of Equiatomic CoPt Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Tsoukatos
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
G. C. Hadjipanayis
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
Y. J. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
M. Waite
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
C. P. Swann
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
I. Shah
Affiliation:
Experimental Station, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. Wilmington, DE 19808
Get access

Abstract

The magnetic hysteresis behavior of crystalline Co50Pt50 films has been studied in samples with thickness in the range of 100-2000 Å. The room temperature coercivities of the as-grown films are of the order of 100 Oe. After annealing at 650°C the coercivities vary between 400 and 4300 Oe with the higher values obtained in thicker specimens. The high coercivities obtained are attributed to the hard magnetic phase CoPt with an ordered fct structure that is formed after annealing. The variaton of coercivity with thickness is examined and related to the crystal structure evolution and to grain size effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Darling, A. S., Plat. Metals Rev., 7, 96 (1963).Google Scholar
2. MacGuire, R. A., Gaunt, P., Phil. Mag. 13, 567 (1966).Google Scholar
3. Craik, D. J., Plat. Metals. Rev. 16, 129 (1972).Google Scholar
4. Aboaf, J. A., Herd, S. R., Klokholm, E., IEEE Trans. Mag., MAG–19, 1514 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Naoe, M., Hoshi, Y., Yamanaka, S., Kume, M., IEEE Trans. Mag., MAG–19, 1519 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Yanagisawa, M., Yamaguchi, N., Suganuma, Y., IEEE Trans. Mag., MAG–19, 1638 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kitada, M., Shimizu, N., J. Appl. Phys., 54, 7089 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Tsoukatos, A., Hadjipanayis, G. C., Swann, C. P., Shah, I., to be published in the Proc. of NATO ASI, Crete, Greece, (1990).Google Scholar
9. Kittel, C., Rev. Mod. Phys., 21, 541 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kittel, C., Phys. Rev., 70, 321 (1946).Google Scholar
11. Victora, R. H., Phys. Rev. Letters, 58(17), 1788 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Cullity, B. D., Intro. Magn. Materials, Addison-Wesley, (1972), p. 385.Google Scholar
13. Aharoni, A., Phys. Stat. Sol., 16, 3 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar