Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:00:07.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermodynamic Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of Kd Values for Radionuclide Migration in Sedimentary Host Rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Caterina Talerico
Affiliation:
BMG Engineering Ltd., Ifangstrasse 11, CH-8952 Schlieren-Zürich, Switzerland
Michael Ochs
Affiliation:
BMG Engineering Ltd., Ifangstrasse 11, CH-8952 Schlieren-Zürich, Switzerland
Shinzo Ueta
Affiliation:
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation (MMTL), Tokyo, Japan
Noriyuki Sasaki
Affiliation:
Japan Nuclear Fuel Ltd. (JNFL), Japan
Get access

Abstract

The effects of key geochemical parameters on Kd values for radionuclides in the host rock (pumice, sandstone) of a LLW repository were elucidated through a sensitivity analysis, using a thermodynamic speciation/sorption model for the elements Sr and Ni. The complex mineral assemblage of the rock was approximated by a component-additivity approach. Using published ion exchange and surface complexation parameters, Kd for both Sr and Ni could be well explained by the same model mineralogy and surface chemistry. Model results suggest that pCO2 can have a significant effect on Kd, and that a correct approximation of groundwater chemistry is a critical component of sorption modeling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shimoda, H., Iimura, H., and Kuroda, T. 1991. Journal of Atomic Energy Society of Japan, 33, 11. In Japanese.Google Scholar
2. Ueta, S., Yajima, T., and Okada, K. 2000. Proc. Disposal Technologies and Concepts 2000, Berlin, Germany, 562566.Google Scholar
3. Stumm, W. and Morgan, J.J 1996. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Davies, J.A., Coston, J.A., Kent, D.B. and Fuller, C.C. 1998. Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 28202828.Google Scholar
5. Bradbury, M.H. and Baeyens, B. 1997. J. Contam. Hydrol., 27, 223248.Google Scholar
6. Oda, C. and Shibata, M. 1999. JNC Technical Report, JNC, Tokai-mura, Japan.Google Scholar
7. Fletcher, P. and Sposito, G. 1989, Clays Clay Miner., 24, 375391.Google Scholar
8. Schindler, P.W. and Stumm, W. 1987. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 83110.Google Scholar
9. Berner, U. 1993. MINSURF. PSI, Villigen, Switzerland, personal communication.Google Scholar