Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:22:51.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermally Driven In-Situ Removal of Native Oxide Using Anhydrous Hydrogen Fluoride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Pushkar P. Apte
Affiliation:
currently with Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX 75265
Heungsoo Park
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Krishna C. Saraswat
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
C. R. Helms
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

In-situ native-oxide removal is critical for epitaxial single-crystal silicon deposition, for polysilicon emitters and contacts and for ultrathin gate dielectric films in integrated circuit (IC) fabrication. We have developed an in-situ, thermally-driven, anhydrous hydrogen fluoride (AHF)-based native-oxide removal technique in which the wafer is treated by AHF at low temperatures (300-400°C) and a short (10 sec) 950°C ‘spike’ in AHF-H2 immediately prior to Si deposition. This process removes native oxides formed by standard wet cleans such as HC1:H202 and NH4OH:H202, as well as native oxides formed by the clean-room ambient. Further, the technique is an effective pre-clean for both polysilicon and epitaxial silicon deposition. This flexibility, combined with other salient features such as simplicity and a low thermal budget, make the process eminently suited for IC fabrication.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Smith, F. W. and Ghidini, G.. J. Electrochem. Soc., 129: 1300, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 van der Heide, P. A. M. et al. J. Vac. Set. Technol., A7: 1719, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Morita, M. et al. Appl. Phys. Lett., 55(6): 562, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Meyerson, B. S. et al. J. Electrochem. Soc., 133(6): 1232, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Burger, W. R. and Reif, R.. J. Appl. Phys., 62(10):4255, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Burns, G. P.. Appl. Phys. Lett., 53(15):1423, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Helms, C. R. and Deal, B. E.. J. Vac. Sci. and Technol., 10(4): 806, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Apte, P. P., Saraswat, K. C., Moslehi, M. M., and Yeakley, R.. in Proc. Third Intl. Symp. on VLSI Science and Technology, Washington D. C., 91-11:755–64, 1991.Google Scholar
9 Apte, Pushkar P., Venkatraman, R., Saraswat, K. C., Moslehi, M. M., and Yeakley, R.. in Rapid Thermal and Integrated Processing, Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., 224:273–8, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Apte, Pushkar P. and Saraswat, Krishna C.. IEEE Tran., on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 5(3): 180, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Miki, N. et al. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 37: 107, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar