Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T20:18:05.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

γ/γ′: The Key to Superalloy Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. F. Giamei ,
D. D. Pearson  and
D. L. Anton
A. F. Giamei
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center, Silver Lane, E. Hartford, CT 06108
D. D. Pearson
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center, Silver Lane, E. Hartford, CT 06108
D. L. Anton
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center, Silver Lane, E. Hartford, CT 06108
Get access

Abstract

Gamma prime (Ni3Al), with its unusual temperature dependence of yield strength, is the strengthening phase in Ni-base superalloys. Many facets of γ/γ′ coherent precipitation strengthening have been well studied: coarsening kinetics, volume fraction vs. strength, yield strength vs. temperature, dislocation dynamics, etc.

This contribution deals with several important aspects of two phase behavior in coherent systems (for high temperature application) which are either relatively new or have received inadequate attention. The most desirable γ/γ′ misfit, in sense and magnitude, is dependent on the temperature of application. It must be recognized that the sense and size of misfit are not only a function of alloying, but temperature as well. Sufficient data are presented for various alloying additions to γ and γ′ to allow one to roughly compute the misfit at room temperature or 1000C. The evolution and significance of the ′′ morphology are discussed. Stability of particle size and shape are related to misfit, temperature and stress. It is demonstrated that for high temperature creep resistance, a fine rafted structure is the most desirable. Finally, some data are presented which demonstrate the dependence of γ′ strength on stoichiometry as well-as temperature.

A portion of this work was sponsored by AFOSR, with A. Rosenstein as contract monitor.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 39: Symposium G – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys I , 1984 , 293
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kear, B. H., Giamei, A. F. and Oblak, J. M., Scripta Met. 4, 567–573 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Kear, B. H., Oblak, J. M. and Giamei, A. F., Met. Trans. 1, 2477–2486 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kear, B. H., Giamei, A. F., Leverant, G. R. and Oblak, J. M., Scripta Met. 3 123–129 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Pope, D. P. and Ezz, S. S., International Metals Reviews 29 No. 3, 136–167 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kear, B. H. and Pope, D. P., Proceedings of the Conference on Refractory Alloying Elements in Superalloys - Effects and Availability, ASM (1984).Google Scholar
6. Doi, M. and Miyazaki, T., Superalloys 1984, 543–552, Gell, M. Kortovich, C., Bricknell, R., Kent, W. and Radavich, J., ed., AIME (1984).Google Scholar
7. Tien, J. and Copley, S., Met. Trans. 2, 543–553 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Pearson, D., Lemkey, F. and Kear, B., Superalloys -1980, 513–520, Tien, J., Wlodek, S., Morrow, H. III, Gell, M. and Mauer, G., ed., ASM (1980).Google Scholar
9. McKay, R. and Ebert, L., Superalloys -1984, 135–144, Gell, M. Kortovich, C., Bricknell, R., Kent, W. and Radavich, J., ed., AIME (1984).Google Scholar
10. Kahn, T., Caron, P. and Duret, C., Superalloys -1984, 135–144, Gell, M. Kortovich, C., Bricknell, R., Kent, W. and Radavich, J., ed., AIME (1984).Google Scholar
11. Giamei, A. F., Kraft, E. H. and Lemkey, F. D., New Trends in Materials Processing, 48–97, ASM (1976).Google Scholar
12. Kriege, O.H. and Bans, J. M., Trans. ASM, 62 194–200 (1969).Google Scholar
13. Copley, S. M. and Kear, B. H., Trans. TMS-AIME, 239, 984–992 (1967).Google Scholar
14. Grose, D. A. and Ansell, G. S., Met. Trans. 12A, 1631–1645 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Davies, R. and Johnston, T., Ordered Alloys, 447–474, Kear, B., Sims, C., Stoloff, N. and Westbrook, J., ed., Claitor's, Baton Rouge, LA (1970).Google Scholar
16. Giamei, A. F., AFOSR Final Report, Contract No. F44620–76–0028 (1979).Google Scholar
17. Pineau, A., Acta Met. 24, 559–564 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. McKay, R. A., NASA Technical Memorandum 83698, p. 48 (1984).Google Scholar
19. Gell, M., Duhl, D. and Giamei, A., Superalloys –1980, 205–214, Tien, J., Wlodek, S., Morrow, H. III, Gell, M. and Mauer, G., ed. ASM (1980).Google Scholar
20. Shah, D. M. and Duhl, D. N., Superalloys –1984, 105–114, Gell, M., Kortovich, C., Bricknell, R., Kent, W. and Radavich, J., AIME (1984).Google Scholar
21. Lail, C., Chin, S. and Pope, D., Met. Trans. 10A 1323–1332 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.. Ezz, S S., Pope, D. P. and Paidar, V., Acta Met. 16, 227–231 (1968).Google Scholar
23. Montoya-Cruz, J. J., Kadalbal, R., Kattamis, T. Z. and Giamei, A. F., Met. Trans. 13A, 1153–1159 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Kadalbal, R., Montoya-Cruz, J. J. and Kattamis, T. Z., Met. Trans.. 11A, 1547–1553 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar