Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:47:35.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis, Characterization, and Dynamics of a Rod/Sphere Organoceramic Composite Liquid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Mark A. Tracy  and
R. Pecora
Mark A. Tracy
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Department of Chemistry, Stanford, CA 94305-5080
R. Pecora
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Department of Chemistry, Stanford, CA 94305-5080
Get access

Abstract

Composite liquids – liquids composed of polymers, particles, and small molecule solvents – constitute an important class of synthetic and naturally occurring materials. Examples include molecular composites, ceramic precursors, lubricants, adhesives, and the cytoplasm in biological cells. Due to the complexity of these liquids, experimental studies of precisely defined systems are essential in developing an understanding of the interactions between all components in the liquid. Unfortunately, such fundamental studies have been relatively rare due to both the difficulty of synthesizing precisely defined composite liquids and the lack of adequate experimental methods to monitor the motions of the various constituents.

We have recently reported the synthesis, characterization and some studies of the dynamics of a rod/sphere composite liquid system [1]. In our case the “polymer” constituent is a rigid rod polymer, poly(γ-benzyl-α,L-glutamate) (PBLG). Rigid rod polymers are frequently used in composite liquids as viscosity enhancers. PBLG is commercially available in a wide range of molecular weights and its static and dynamic behavior in dilute and nondilute solutions has been studied. It, in addition, forms mesophases in the concentrated regime. The ceramic “particles” in our composite liquid are coated silica spheres. These spheres are synthesized by the method of Stober et. al. [2] and coated with an organic coating (3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (TPM)) following a procedure based on that of Philipse et. al. [3] to render them dispersible in organic solvents. The spheres with sizes in the range from 10 nm up to almost 1μm can be synthesized with a relatively narrow size distribution. The solvent in our studies is dimethylformamide (DMF). Both polymer and particle are dispersible as singlets (nonaggregating) in these solvents and the PBLG retains its rigid (or nearly rigid) rod conformation. The diffusion of both the polymer and the sphere in the composite liquid is measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) [4]. In this paper, we focus on the spheres and examine the effects of rod concentration and rod length on the diffusion of different size spheres. This study suggests that the solution microstructure has an important influence on sphere diffusion.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 274: Symposium R – Submicron Multiphase Materials , 1992 , 109
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tracy, M.A. and Pecora, R., Macromolecules 25,337 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Stöber, W., Fink, A., and Bohn, E., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 26, 62 (1968).Google Scholar
3. Philipse, A. and Vrij, A., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 128, 121 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Berne, B.J. and Pecora, R., Dynamic Light Scatterin, (John Wiley, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
5. Zero, K.M. and Pecora, R., Macromolecules 15, 87 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Langevin, D. and Rondelez, F., Polymer 19,875 (1978).Google Scholar
7. Phillies, G.D.J., J. Phys. Chem. 93, 5029 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Yang, T. and Jamieson, A.M., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 126, 220 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Zhou, P. and Brown, W., Macromolecules 22, 890 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Brown, W. and Rymddn, R., Macromolecules 21, 840 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Gast, A.P., Hall, C.K., and Russell, W.B., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 96, 251 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Sperry, P.R., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 99, 97 (1984).Google Scholar
13. DeLong, L.M. and Russo, P.S., Macromolecules 24, 6139 (1991).Google Scholar