Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:15:19.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surveying for Migration Pathways in the Granitic Rock Using Nuclear Track Detectors, Autoradiography and Digital Image Analysis as an Aid To Construct the Basis for Heterogeneous Diffusion Modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

M. Kemppainen ,
E. Oila ,
M. Siitari-Kauppi ,
P. Sardini  and
K-H. Hellmuth
M. Kemppainen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O.Box 55, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
E. Oila
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O.Box 55, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
M. Siitari-Kauppi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O.Box 55, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
P. Sardini
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Hydrogeology, Clays, Soils and Alteration, U.M.R. 6532 du C.N.R.S., University of Poitiers, 40 avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cedex, France
K-H. Hellmuth
Affiliation:
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), P.O.Box 14, FIN-00881 Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Radioelement migration within a rock matrix under natural long-term conditions is a complex process controlled by various parameters. Pure physical parameters such as porosity, hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity are usually sufficient to describe transport in well-defined laboratory systems. In natural rock matrices transport is influenced by physical pore properties such as pore size distribution, connectivity, tortuosity, constrictivity and petrological and chemical nature and charge on the fluid-rock interface. The overall characterization of heterogeneous rock structures is needed for the accurate heterogeneous diffusion modeling.

Here we describe a method for the detection of μ-particles from uranium in cm-scale rock samples based on the analysis of the tracks formed in organic polymer, CR-39. On the other hand the uranium tracks were compared with the migration pathways and porosity distribution produced with the 14C-polymethylmethacrylate impregnation method (14C-PMMA). For analyzing mineral specific uranium occurrence and porosities the staining methods were used to produce the mineral map of the rock sample. Digital image analysis techniques were applied to the different cm-scale pictures of rock samples. Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM/EDS) were performed in order both to study the pore apertures of grain boundaries and fissures in greater detail and to detect the uranium phases.

The high uranium content was found to be congruent with the porous mineral phases; altered plagioclase and biotite grains, and the intra- and intergranular fissures detected with the 14C-PMMA technique. Plenty of microfractures transsecting potassium feldspar and quartz grains were filled with calcite together with precipitated uranium.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 663: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste management XXIV , 2000 , 999
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ruskeeniemi, T., Nissinen, P., Lindberg, A., The Palmottu Natural Analoque Project, Technical Report 98–07, (1998), p. 15.Google Scholar
2. Siitari-Kauppi, M., Marcos, N., Klobes, P., Goebbels, J., Timonen, J., Hellmuth, K-H., The Palmottu Natural Analoque Project, Technical Report 99–12, (1999).Google Scholar
3. Hellmuth, K-H., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Lindberg, A., J. Contam Hydrol 13, 403–418 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Hellmuth, K-H., Lukkarinen, S., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Isot. Environ. Healt. S. 30, 47–60 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Siitari-Kauppi, M., Flitsiyan, E.S., Klobes, P., Meyer, K., Hellmuth, K-H. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI1, edited by McKinley, I.G., McCombie, C., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. 506, Warrendale, PA, 1998) pp.671–678.Google Scholar
6. Hellmuth, K.-H., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Klobes, P., Meyer, K., Goebbels, J., Phys. Chem. Earth (A), 24 (7), 569–573 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Cartwright, B.G., Nucl.Instr. and Methods, 153, 457–460 (1978)Google Scholar
8. Durrani, S.A., Bull, R.K. in Solid State Nuclear Track Detection, Principles, Methods and Applications. Pergmon Press, Oxford (1987)Google Scholar
9. Müller, G. in Methods in Sedimentary Petrology, Part I, edited by Engelhardt, W.v., Fuchbauer, H., Muller, G. (E. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 1967), pp 163.Google Scholar
10. Sammartino, S., Partier, P., Sardini, P., Meunier, A., Tevissen, E., Phys. Chem. Earth (A), 24 (7), 601–606 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Sardini, P., Moreau, E., Sammartino, S., Touchard, G., Comput. Geosci. 25, 599–608 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Sardini, P., Doctoral Thesis (1996).Google Scholar
13. Guthrie, V.A., Hart, K.P., Levins, D.M., Seatonberry, B.W., Radiochim. Acta 52/53 159–167 (1991)Google Scholar