Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T00:01:01.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Reconstruction and Strain Relief in Si1−x-Gex Films on Si(100)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Qiuming Yu
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Paulette Clancy
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

The equilibrium structure of a variety of Si1−xGex/Si heterostructures have been simulated by Molecular Dynamics, modeled by the Stillinger-Weber potential, to investigate the effect of strain on the surfaces of SiGe thin Alms. It was found that the strain in SiGe/Si(100) thin films was relaxed by the segregation of Ge to the surface. Rebonding of sub-surface atoms into dimers in the presence of a vacancy or cluster of vacancies above them was observed in the ensuing surface reconstruction. For SiGe/Si, the amount of “re-bonded missing dimers” in the top two layers increased with increasing Ge composition. But for Ge/Si(100), a V-shaped twinning defect was observed in the Ge thin film. To further investigate the effect of strain on surface reconstruction, bulk Si and Ge structures were also studied. For bulk Si, several rebonded missing dimers were found at the surface, while for bulk Ge(100), the surface showed a typical 2×1 reconstruction. All these findings corroborate recent experimental studies and theoretical predictions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Pandey, K.C., in Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors, edited by Chadi, J.D. and Harrison, W.A. (Spring-Verlag, New York, 1985), p. 55.Google Scholar
2. Hamers, R.J., Tromp, R.M., and Demuth, J.E., Phys. Rev. B34, 5343 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. B45, 8833 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Mo, Y.-W. and Lagally, M. G., J. Cryst. Growth 111, 876 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Balamane, H., Halicioglu, T., and Tiller, W.A., Phys. Rev. B46, 2250 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Stillinger, F.H. and Weber, T.A., Phys. Rev. B31, 5262 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Only one density can be used for the entire cell, either that of the alloy or that for the substrate. Using the Si substrate density is appropriate for emulating the situation in real SiGe/Si heterostructures, see Cook, S.J. and Clancy, P., J. Chem. Phys., submitted (1992), for a full discussion on this point.Google Scholar
8. Thompson, M.O., (unpublished).Google Scholar
9. LeGoues, F.K., Copel, M. and Tromp, R.M., Phys. Rev. B42, 11690 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar