Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T04:58:08.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Characterization of Simulated Low-Level Radioactive Waste Glasses Corroded in Water and LiOH Buffer Solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

H. Li ,
M. J. Schweiger ,
P. Hrma  and
X Feng
H. Li
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Box 999, P8–37, Richland, WA 99352
M. J. Schweiger
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Box 999, P8–37, Richland, WA 99352
P. Hrma
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Box 999, P8–37, Richland, WA 99352
X Feng
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Box 999, P8–37, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Chemical durability of simulated radioactive low-level waste (LLW) baseline glass, 6- 5412, was found to decrease with the addition of either phosphate or sulfate, or chromium oxide. Scanning electron microscopic study of corroded samples suggests that the effect of these components on glass chemical durability may be attributed to cluster formation of: Na-O-P-O or Na-O-S-O, or (O0)3-Cr3+(O−)3 groups. Preferential corrosion attack was severe on certain corroded sample surface areas that are possibly enriched in these clusters. Durability tests in a solution with LiOH as a buffer suggest that chlorine in the glass slightly improved glass corrosion resistance, while fluorine significantly deteriorated glass corrosion resistance.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 412: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX , 1995 , 213
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Li, H., Darab, J.G., Smith, P.A., Feng, X, and Peeler, D.K. in Nuclear Materials Management, Vol. XXIV, (36th Annual Meeting Proc., Inst. Nucl. Mater. Manag., Northbrook, IL, 1995), p. 460–465.Google Scholar
2. Jantzen, C.M., Bibler, N.E., Beam, D.C., Ramsey, W.G., and Waters, B.J., WSRC-TR-539 Rev. 2, 1992.Google Scholar
3. McGrail, B.P. and Olson, K.M., PNL-8358 UC-602, 1992.Google Scholar
4. Li, H., Darab, J.G., Smith, P.A., Schweiger, Wi., Smith, D.E., and Hrma, P.R. in Nuclear Materials Manageme, Vol. XXIV, (36th Annual Meeting Proc., Inst. Nucl. Mater. Manag., Northbrook, IL, 1995), p. 466–471.Google Scholar
5. Feng, X, Peeler, D.K., McGrail, B.P., Hrma, P.R, Chang, C.Y., Bakel, A.J., and Ebert, W.L. in Scientific Basis For Nuclear Waste Management XIX Boston, MA, 1996 (This volume).Google Scholar
6. Darab, J.G., Li, H., Matson, D.W., Smith, P.A., and MacCrone, R.K. in Appication of Synchrotron Radiation in Chemistry and Related Fields, 201th American Chemical Society Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 1995 (in press)Google Scholar
7. Lockyer, M.W.G., Holland, D., and Dupree, R, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 188, 207–219 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Nelson, C. and Tallant, D.R, Phys. Chem. Glasses, 25(2), 31–38 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Singh, S.P. and Nath, G.P., J. Mater. Sci., 16, 2176–2180 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Dumas, P., Corset, J., Carvalho, W., Levy, Y., and Neuman, Y., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 47, 239–243 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Rabinovich, E.M., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 24(2), 54–56 (1983).Google Scholar