Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T19:16:13.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface and Interfacial Topography of Oxides on Si(111) With Ultra-Low Atomic Step Density

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Antonio C. Oliver
Affiliation:
Materials Science & Engineering Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, blakely@ccmr.cornell.edu
Jack M. Blakely
Affiliation:
Materials Science & Engineering Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, blakely@ccmr.cornell.edu
Get access

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy has been used to study the morphology of the oxide surface and the Si-SiO2 interface after oxidation of Si(111) surfaces that are either totally free of atomic steps or have well characterized low step density. The step-free areas were formed by thermally processing a patterned Si surface in which flat areas are enclosed by a square array of ridges; flow of the atomic steps into the surrounding ridge barriers produces a regular array of step-free areas each of which can be up to ∼50µm×50µm. Arrays of widely spaced steps (e.g. 5µm) can also be produced in the step-free areas. AFM scans of the same areas were taken prior to (dry) oxidation, after oxidation, and after chemical removal of the oxide. It was found that at an oxide thickness in the 5-13nm range, the initial step structure of the underlying Si substrates is translated through the oxide to the surface after oxidation with the oxide surface being somewhat rougher than the initial substrate. Furthermore, the initial step morphology of the substrate remains at the Si-SiO2 interface after etching away the oxide by HF. The interface roughness is less than that of the oxide surface. The results suggest that the initial oxidation of silicon proceeds in a ‘layer by layer’ manner and not through a preferential step-flow oxide growth mode.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Ohmi, T., Kotani, K., Teramoto, A., and Miyashita, M., IEEE Electron Device Letters 12, 652 (1991).Google Scholar
2.Homma, Y., Suzuki, M., and Yabumoto, N., Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A 10, 2055 (1992).Google Scholar
3.Suzuki, M., Homma, Y., Kudoh, Y., and Yabumoto, N., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 32, 1419 (1993).Google Scholar
4.Ross, F. M. and Gibson, J. M., Physical Review Letters 68, 1782 (1992).Google Scholar
5.Pietsch, G. J., Köhler, U., Jusko, O., Henzler, M., and Hahn, P. O., Applied Physics Letters 60, 1321 (1992).Google Scholar
6.Miyata, N., Watanabe, H., and Ichikawa, M., Applied Physics Letters 72, 1715 (1998).Google Scholar
7.Tanaka, S., Umbach, C. C., Blakely, J. M., Tromp, R. M., and Mankos, M., Applied Physics Letters 69, 1235 (1996).Google Scholar
8.Homma, Y., Aizawa, N., and Ogino, T., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 35, L241 (1996).Google Scholar
9.Lee, D. and Blakely, J. M., Surface Science (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
10.Watanabe, H., Kato, K., Uda, T., Fujita, K., Ichikawa, M., Kawamura, T., and Terakura, K., Physical Review Letters 80, 345 (1998).Google Scholar
11.Fujita, S., Watanabe, H., Maruno, S., Ichikawa, M., and Kawamura, T., Applied Physics Letters 71, 885 (1997).Google Scholar
12.Komeda, T., Namba, K., and Nishioka, Y., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 35, 241 (1996).Google Scholar
13.Ono, Y., Tabe, M., and Kageshima, H., Physical Review B 48, 14291 (1993).Google Scholar
14.Ikegami, H., Ohmori, K., Ikeda, H., Iwano, H., Zaima, S., and Yasuda, Y., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 35, 1593 (1996).Google Scholar
15.Udagawa, M., Niwa, M., and Sumita, I., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 33, 375 (1994).Google Scholar
16.Fujita, K., Watanabe, H., and Ichikawa, M., Journal of Applied Physics 83, 3638 (1998).Google Scholar