Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T10:17:22.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sulfur Passivation of InP and GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

A. Kapila
Affiliation:
Optoelectronics Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2540 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822
X. Si
Affiliation:
Optoelectronics Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2540 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822
V. Malhotra
Affiliation:
Optoelectronics Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2540 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822
Get access

Abstract

Passivation of electronic defect states at the SiNx/InP and the SiNx/GaAs interfaces has been achieved using both ‘wet’ (ammonium and phosphorous polysulfide solutions) and ‘dry’ (H2S gas) sulfur treatments. The passivated surfaces are encapsulated by depositing SiNx overlayers at ∼ 200 °C using the electron cyclotron resonance plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (ECR-PECVD) technique. The capacitance-voltage (C-V) characteristics of metal-insulatorsemiconductor (MIS) capacitors indicate substantial reduction in the density of interface defects. Schottky diodes, fabricated in sulfur-treated n-GaAs, also exhibit significant improvements. The H2S-treatment provides better reproducibility and uniformity when compared with the ‘wet’ sulfide treatment of the surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sandroff, C. J., Nottenburg, R. N., Bischoff, J.-C., and Bhat, R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 33 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Yablonovitch, E., Sandroff, C. J., Bhat, R., and Gmitter, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 439 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Iyer, R., Chang, R. R., and Lile, D. L., Appl.Phys.Lett., 53, 134 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Kapila, A. and Malhotra, V., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62, 1009 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Iyer, R. and Lile, D. L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 59, 437 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Kapila, A., Si, X., and Malhotra, V., Appl. Phys. Lett., (in press).Google Scholar
7. Spindt, C. J. and Spicer, W. E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 55, 1653 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Wang, Y., Darici, Y. and Holloway, P. H., J. Appl. Phys., 71, 2746 (1992).Google Scholar