Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:34:07.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sub-Second Humidity Sensing based on Nanostructured Narrow-Bandpass Optical Filters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

John Jeremiah Steele
Affiliation:
jsteele@ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9107 116 street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4, Canada, 780-492-7926, 780-492-2863
Andy C. van Popta
Affiliation:
vanpopta@ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9107 116 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4, Canada
Matthew M. Hawkeye
Affiliation:
mhawkeye@ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9107 116 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4, Canada
Jeremy C. Sit
Affiliation:
jsit@ece.ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9107 116 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4, Canada
Michael J. Brett
Affiliation:
brett@ece.ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9107 116 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4, Canada
Get access

Abstract

An optical-based humidity sensor with a sub-second response time was fabricated from a nanostructured titanium dioxide thin film. A refractive index profile designed to yield a narrow-bandpass optical interference filter was obtained through nanoscale porosity variations produced by glancing angle deposition (GLAD). Under varying humidity conditions the transmittance spectrum of the filter shifts due to effective index changes of the porous structure resulting from adsorption/desorption of water vapor. In the following we will show that this device is highly sensitive, exhibits minimal hysteresis, and is extremely fast. The adsorption and desorption response times were measured to be 270 ms and 160 ms, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wiederhold, P.R., Water Vapor Measurement (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
2 Arai, H., and Seiyama, T., Sensors A Comprehensive Survey Volume 3 (VCH, Weinheim, 1992) p. 981.Google Scholar
3 Kang, U., and Wise, K.D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 47, 702 (2000).Google Scholar
4 Tetelin, A., Pellet, C., Laville, C., and N'Kaoua, G., Sens. Actuators, B 91, 211 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Breen, P.H., U.S. Patent No. 6 014 890 (January 18, 2000).Google Scholar
6 Popta, A.C. van, Sit, J.C. and Brett, M.J., Appl. Opt. 43, 3632 (2004).Google Scholar
7 Popta, A.C. van, Hawkeye, M.M., Sit, J.C. and Brett, M.J., Opt. Lett. 29, 2545 (2004).Google Scholar
8 Vick, D., Sit, J.C. and Brett, M.J., Recent Developments in Vacuum Science and Technology 2003 (Research Signpost, Kerala, 2003) p. 67.Google Scholar
9 Robbie, K., and Brett, M.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 15, 1460 (1997).Google Scholar
10 Tait, R.N., Smy, T., and Brett, M.J., Thin Solid Films 226, 196 (1993).Google Scholar
11 Kennedy, S.R. and Brett, M.J., Appl. Opt. 42, 4573 (2003).Google Scholar
12 Southwell, W.H., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1558 (1988).Google Scholar
13 Bovard, B.G., Appl. Opt. 32, 5427 (1993).Google Scholar
14 Varghese, O.K., Gong, D., Paulose, M., Ong, K.G., Grimes, C.A. and Dickey, E.C., J. Mater. Res. 17, 1162 (2002).Google Scholar
15 Chou, K.S., Lee, T.K. and Liu, F.J., Sens. Actuators, B 56, 106 (1999).Google Scholar
16 Seiyama, T., Yamazoe, N., and Arai, H., Sens. Actuators 4, 85 (1983).Google Scholar