Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T22:23:21.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the MBE HgTe Growth Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Roland J. Koestner  and
H. F. Schaake
Roland J. Koestner
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments, Inc., Central Research laboratories, Dallas, Tx 75265
H. F. Schaake
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments, Inc., Central Research laboratories, Dallas, Tx 75265
Get access

Abstract

The MBE growth of HgTe on CdTe is examined over a hundred-fold range in Hg/Te2 flux ratio and over four separate substrate surface orientations [(111)Te, (111)Te-4 degrees, (112)Te and (001)]. The 77K Hall mobility of the (112)Te and (001) oriented HgTe layers approaches the best bulk values reported to date, although our (111)Te and (111)Te-4 deg oriented HgTe films yield much lower values. The growth process is shown to be very far from thermodynamic equilibrium at our optimal substrate temperature and calculated equivalent Hg beam pressure. Important clues to help understand the kinetics governing the HgTe growth process are uncovered by studying the defects that form under Hg- or Te-rich conditions with cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (XTEM). Since multilayered structures are an important application for MBE growth of Hg-based semiconductors, we have also examined the interfacial roughness present in HgTe-CdTe superlattices (SL) as a function of growth orientation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 90: Symposium R – Materials for Infrared Detectors and Sources , 1986 , 311
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dubowski, J.J., Dietl, T., Szymanska, W. and Galazka, R.R., J.Phys.Chem. Solids 42, 351(1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2) Sivananthan, S., Chu, X., Reno, J. and Faurie, J.P., J.Appl.Phys. 60, 1359 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3) Schaake, H.F., J.Electron Mat. 14, 513 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4) Chew, N.G., Cullis, A.G. and Williams, G.M., Appl.Pthys.Lett. 45, 1090 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5) Benson, J.D., Wagner, B.K., Torabi, A. and Summers, C.J., Awpl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1034 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6) Petroff, P.M., Miller, R.C., Gossard, A.C. and Wiegmann, W., Appl.Phys. Iett. 44, 217 (1984).Google Scholar