Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T04:15:41.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of the Electronic Properties of Matched Na-Containing and Reduced-Na CuInGaSe2 Samples Using Junction Capacitance Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Peter T Erslev
Affiliation:
perslev@darkwing.uoregon.edu, ., ., ., ., OR, ., United States
Adam Halverson
Affiliation:
ahalvers@uoregon.edu, University of Oregon, Physics Department, Eugene, OR, 97405, United States
William Shafarman
Affiliation:
wns@udel.edu, Institute of Energy Conversion, Newark, DE, 19716, United States
J. David Cohen
Affiliation:
dcohen@uoregon.edu, University of Oregon, Physics Department, Eugene, OR, 97405, United States
Get access

Abstract

Junction capacitance methods were used to examine a matched pair of CuInGaSe2 (CIGS) thin film solar cells, one with Na incorporated into the absorber and the other with a diffusion barrier to inhibit the Na incorporation from the soda-lime glass. Typical cells showed a 50% increase in efficiency with the addition of Na. Forward biased admittance spectroscopy revealed a large defect density located near the CdS/CIGS heterojunction in the reduced Na samples not present in the higher Na samples. This may be responsible for the lower Voc, contributing to the loss in efficiency when Na is not added. Drive-level capacitance profiles revealed free carrier densities of 3×1014cm-3 and 1.1×1014cm-3 for the higher and reduced Na samples, respectively. Transient photocapacitance spectra indicated a slight improvement in absorber properties with the addition of Na, but not enough to account for the large loss in efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ramanathan, K., Contreras, M. A., Perkins, C. L., Asher, S., Hasoon, F. S., Keane, J., Young, D., Romero, M., Metzger, W., Noufi, R., Ward, J. and Duda, A., Prog. Photovolt. 11, 225 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Lei, C., Li, C. M., Rockett, A. and Robertson, I. M., J. Appl. Phys. 101, 24909 (2007).Google Scholar
3. Lyahovitskaya, V., Feldman, Y., Gartsman, K., Cohen, H., Cytermann, C., and Cahen, David, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 4205 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Rockett, A., Thin Solid Films 480-1, 2 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Rudmann, D., Bremaud, D., Zogg, H. and Tiwari, A. N., J. Appl. Phys. 97, 84903 (2005).Google Scholar
6. Heath, J. T., Cohen, J. D., and Shafarman, W. N., J. Appl. Phys. 95, 1000 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Cohen, J. D., Heath, J. T., and Shafarman, W. N. in Wide Gap Chalcopyrites, edited by Rau, U. and Siebentritt, S., (Springer, Berlin, 2005) pp. 6990.Google Scholar
8. Wasim, S. M., Rincon, C., Marin, G., Bocaranda, P., Hernandez, E., Bonalde, I. and Medina, E., Phys. Rev. B. 64, 195101 (2001).Google Scholar