Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T21:25:29.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of Nanophase TiO2 Grain Boundaries by Raman Spectroscopy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

C. A. Melendres
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
A. Narayanasamy
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Physics, University of Madras, Madras, 600 025 India
V. A. Maroni
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
R. W. Siegel
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
Get access

Abstract

Raman spectra have been recorded for as-consolidated nanophase TiO2 samples with differing grain sizes and on samples annealed in air at a variety of temperatures up to 1273 K. The nanophase samples with the smallest grain size, about 12 nm average diameter, could have 15-30% of their atoms in grain boundaries; nevertheless, the strong Raman-active lines representative of the rutile structure were found to dominate all of the observed spectra, independent of grain size and annealing treatment. These lines were quite broad in the as-consolidated nanophase samples, equally in 12 nm and 100 nm grain-size compacts, but sharpened considerably upon annealing at elevated temperatures. The Raman data give no indication of grain-boundary structures in nanophase TiO2 that are significantly different from those in conventional polycrystals. However, defect structures within the grains, which anneal out at elevated temperatures, are evidenced by changes in the Raman spectra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, BES-Materials Sciences, under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38.

References

1. Birringer, R., Herr, U., and Gleiter, H., Suppl. Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 27, 43 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Siegel, R. W. and Hahn, H., in Current Trends in the Physics of Materials, Yussouff, M., ed. (World Scientific Publ., Singapore, 1987) p. 403.Google Scholar
3. Siegel, R. W. and Eastman, J. A., in Multicomponent Ultrafine Microstructures, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 132, 3 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Epperson, J. E., Siegel, R. W., White, J. W., Klippert, T. E., Narayanasamy, A., Eastman, J. A., and Trouw, F., in Multicomponent Ultrafine Microstructures, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 132, 15 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Zhu, X., Birringer, R., Herr, U., and Gleiter, H., Phys. Rev. B 35, 9085 (1987); R. Birringer, Mater. Sci. and Engineering A, in press (1989).Google Scholar
6. Siegel, R. W., Ramasamy, S., Hahn, H., Li, Z., Lu, T., and Gronsky, R., J. Mater. Res. 3, 1367 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Balachandran, U. and Eror, N. G., J. Solid State Chem. 42, 276 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Maroni, V. A., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 49, 307 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Pawlewicz, W. T., Exarhos, G. J., and Conaway, W. E., Appl. Optics 22, 1837 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Exarhos, G. J., J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5211 (1984); Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 48, 461 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Porto, S. P. S., Fleury, P. A., and Damon, T. C., Phys. Rev. 154, 522 (1967).Google Scholar
12. Hara, Y. and Nicol, M., phys. stat. sol. (b) 94, 317 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Melendres, C. A., Narayanasamy, A., Maroni, V. A., and Siegel, R. W., J. Mater. Res. 4, in press (1989).Google Scholar
14. Bursill, L. A., Hyde, B. G., Terasaki, C., and Watanabe, D., Philos. Mag. 20, 347 (1969).Google Scholar
15. Anderson, J. S. and Tilley, R. J. D., J. Solid State Chem. 2, 472 (1970).Google Scholar
16. Li, Z., Ramasamy, S., Hahn, H., and Siegel, R. W., Mater. Letters 6, 195 (1988).Google Scholar