Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:34:24.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of Epitaxial Relations of CaF2 Films Grown on (111) Silicon by Molecular Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

H.Y. Liu  and
C.C. Cho
H.Y. Liu
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Texas Instruments Incorporated, P.O. Box 655936, MS 147, Dallas, TX 75265
C.C. Cho
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Texas Instruments Incorporated, P.O. Box 655936, MS 147, Dallas, TX 75265
Get access

Abstract

When preparing single-crystal films of CaF2 on (111) oriented silicon by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), we found that these dielectric films grew into either A or B type depending on the substrate temperature during growth. A-type films follow the same orientation as that of the substrate silicon, while B-type films rotate 180° about the surface normal with respect to the substrates.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirms the single crystallinity and identifies the epitaxial relationships between the film and the substrate. Epitaxial CaF2 films were obtained at growth temperatures ranging from 200°C to 800°C. Employing the asymmetric x-ray diffraction of atomic planes inclined to the sample surface, we found that A-type CaF2 grows at lower substrate temperatures, while B-type films dominate at higher temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 221: Symposium C – Heteroepitaxy of Dissimilar Materials , 1991 , 111
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Phillips, J.M. and Yashinovitz, C.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A2(2), 415–417 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Tsutsui, K., Ishiwara, H., Asano, T. and Furukawa, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46(12), 1131–1133 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Asano, T. and Ishiwara, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 42(6) 517–519 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Cho, C.C., Liu, H.Y., Gnade, B.E. and Chen, C.E., Extended Abstract of 22nd Conference, Solid State Devices and Materials, Sendal, Japan, 1167–1168 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Schowater, L.J. and Fathauer, R.W., CRC Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, Vol. 15, Issue 4, 367–421 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Batstone, J.L., Phillips, J.M. and Hunke, E.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 60 No.14, 1394–1397 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Tromp, R.M., Reuter, M.C., LeGouse, F.K. and Krakow, W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol.7, No.3, 1910–1913 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Zegenhagen, J. and Patel, J.R., Phys. Rev. B, Vol.41, No. 8, 5315–5318 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Headrick, R.L., Weir, B.E., Bevk, J., Freer, B.S., Eaglesham, D.J. and Feldman, L.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 5 No.9, 1128–1131 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Cho, C.C. and Liu, H.Y., this proceeding.Google Scholar