Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:24:20.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and Reactivity of RH in the SMSI State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Ehrich J. Braunschweig
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical & Nuclear Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.
A. David Logan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical & Nuclear Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.
Abhaya K. Datye
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical & Nuclear Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogenolysis of n-butane and CO hydrogenation were used to charac-terize the behavior of TiO2 supported Rh in the SMSI state. The Rh was supported on a model support consisting of nonporous spherical particles of TiO2. The simple geometry of the support permits the metal crystallites to be imaged ‘edge-on’ in a transmission electron microscope. This allows detailed examination of the metal surface and the metal-oxide interface as a function of pretreatment. After high temperature reduction in H2, there is no significant change in the morphology of the Rh crystallites. However, the presence of amorphous overlayers 0.2–0.4 nm thick is clearly evident on the Rh surface. These overlayers can only be partially removed after oxidation at 473 K. The presence of these overlayers is well correlated with the drop in hydrogen chemisorption and altered reactivity. While the butane hydrogenolysis activity of Rh is considerably suppressed in the SMSI state, the CO hydrogenation activity is increased by a factor of 3. The H2 uptake and the butane hydrogenolysis activity can be only partially restored after oxidation at 473 K. Treatment at 773 K in oxygen is necessary for restoring the pre-SMSI behavior.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C., and Garten, R. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 170 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Santos, J., Phillips, J., and Dumesic, J.A., J. Catal. 81, 147 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Belton, D. N., Sun, Y.-M., and White, J. M., J. Am. Soc. 106, 3059 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Sadeghi, H. B. and Henrich, V. E., J. Catal. 87, 279 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Baker, R. T., Prestridge, E. B., and Garten, R. L., J. Catal. 56, 390 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Baker, R. T., Prestridge, E. B., and Murrell, L. L., J. Catal. 79, 348 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Singh, A. K., Pande, N. K., and Bell, A. T., J. Catal. 94, 422 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Treacy, M. M. J. and Howie, A. J., J. Catal. 63, 265 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Datye, A. K. and Logan, A. D., Proc. 44th meeting of the Electron Microsc. Soc. Amer., pg 772, ed. Bailey, G. W., San Francisco Press, 1986.Google Scholar
10. Logan, A. D., Braunschweig, E. J., Datye, A. K., and Smith, D. J., sub-mitted to Langmuir.Google Scholar
11. Chakraborti, S., Datye, A.K. and Long, N.J., J. Catal., 108, in press.Google Scholar
12. Demmin, R. A., Ko, C. S., and Gorte, R. J., Strong Metal Support Interactions, ACS Symposium Series 298, eds. Baker, R. T. K., Tauster, S. J., and Dumesic, J. A.., p 48 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Vannice, M. A. and Garten, R. L., J. Catal. 56, 236 (1979).Google Scholar
14. Resasco, D.E. and Haller, G.L., J. Catal. 82, 279 (1983).Google Scholar
15. Engstrom, J. R., Goodman, D. W., and Weinberg, W. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 4653 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Burch, R. and Flambard, A. R., J. Catal. 78, 389 (1982).Google Scholar