Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T13:31:37.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Structure and Properties of Boundaries in Bicrystals of Boron-Doped Ni3(Al,l at% Ta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

M. J. Mills
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551–0969.
S. H. Goods
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551–0969.
S. M. Foiles
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551–0969.
Get access

Abstract

The effect of boron on the structure and macroscopic properties of an isolated grain boundary in bicrystals of a non-stoichiometric Ni3Al alloy (76 at% Ni, 23 at% Al, 1 at%Ta) has been studied. The room temperature tensile ductility and fracture mode of the bicrystals varies dramatically with the rate of cooling after elevated temperature heat treatment. In the absence of significant segregation of boron to the boundary, the bicrystals fail via brittle interfacial fracture with little or no ductility. When the segregation of boron to the boundary is maximized, the bicrystals are highly ductile. High resolution transmission electron microscopy reveals that this ductile state is achieved without the formation of a detectable region of compositional disorder at the boundary. Atomistic calculations using a Monte Carlo scheme predict that only partial disordering of the planes immediately adjacent to the boundary should occur for Ni-rich alloys both with and without boron. These results suggest that the presence of boron causes an increase in the cohesive energy of the boundaries rather than a change in the local compositional ordering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Aoki, K. and Izumi, O., Nippon Kinzaku Gakkaishi, 43, 1190 (1979).Google Scholar
2. King, A. H. and Yoo, M. H., Scripta Met., 21, 1115 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Mackenzie, R.A.D. and Sass, S.L., Scripta Met., 22, 1807 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Mills, M. J., Scripta Met., 23, 2061 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Krzanowski, J. E., Scripta Met., 23, 1219 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Lin, H. and Pope, D. P., J. Mater. Res., 5, 763 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Heredia, F. E. and Pope, D. P., MRS Proceedings, 133, 287 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Choudhury, A., White, C. L. and Brooks, C. R., MRS Proceedings, 122, 261 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Stadelmann, P., Ultramicroscopy, 21, 131 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev. B, 32, 7685 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Voter, A. F. and Chen, S. P., MRS Proceedings, 82, 175 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Foiles, S. M., MRS Proceedings, 81, 51 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Chen, S. P., Voter, A. F., Albers, R. C., Boring, A. M. and Hay, P. J., J. Mater. Res., 5, 955 (1990).Google Scholar