Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T00:03:04.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress Evolution In Sputtered Fcc Metal Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Vidya Ramaswamy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
William D. Nix
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
Bruce M. Clemens
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
Get access

Abstract

During growth of Cu/Pd multilayers the apparent stress in the Cu layers changes from compressive to tensile during the growth of a single Cu layer. The apparent stress in the Pd layers is initially either tensile or compressive depending on the thickness of the underlying Cu layer. It has been speculated that this stress behaviour may be either a result of island growth of Cu on Pd or alloying at the Cu/Pd interface[I]. We have observed that the stress behavior is similar in Cu/Pd and Pd/Pt multilayers and continue to study these systems to better understand the origins of stress in metal multilayers. Stress evolution during growth is monitored by in-situ substrate curvature measurement using a multiple parallel laser beam technique. High angle superlattice spectra for the multilayers are found from symmetric x-ray diffraction scans in order to determine crystallographic texture. Information about interfacial disorder and alloying in the layers is obtained from simulation of the superlattice diffraction patterns. Stress behaviour is correlated with possible modes of growth of the layers, and with atomic peening and coherency effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ueda, T., Simenson, G.F., Nix, W.D., and Clemens, B.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., Proc.382, 279, (1995).Google Scholar
[2]Danieis, B.J., Nix, W.D., and Clemens, B.M., J. Mat. Res., 9, 3145, (1994).Google Scholar
[3]Floro, J.A., Chason, E., and Lee, S.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., Surface/Interface and Stress Effects in Electronic Material Nanostructures, 381 (1995).Google Scholar
[4] k-Space Associates, Inc., 2231 Stone Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105.Google Scholar
[5]Fullerton, E.E., Schuller, I.K., Vanderstraeten, H., and Bruynseraede, Y., Phys. Rev. B, 45, 9292, (1992).Google Scholar
[6]Oral, B., Kothari, R., and Vook, R.W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A,7–3, 2020, (1989).Google Scholar
[7]Cammarata, R.C., Prog. Surf. Sci., 46–1,1, (1994).Google Scholar
[8]Kutka, R.V. and Freund, L.B., (to appear in J. Mech. Phys. Solids).Google Scholar
[9]Thornton, J.A. and Hoffman, D.W., Thin Solid Films, 171, 5, (1989).Google Scholar
[10]Nakayama, N., Wu, L., Dohnomae, H., Shinjo, T., Kim, J., and Falco, C.M., J. Magn. Magn. Mat., 126, 71, (1993).Google Scholar