Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:33:56.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress Corrosion Crack Growth in Copper for Waste Canister Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Kjell Pettersson
Affiliation:
Dept of Materials Science and Engineering, Brinellvägen 23, KTH, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Magnus Oskarsson
Affiliation:
Dept of Materials Science and Engineering, Brinellvägen 23, KTH, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Stress corrosion crack growth in pure copper has been studied with the aim of determining data which may be used in extrapolations to conditions of interest for use of copper as a canister material for long term storage of spent nuclear fuel. The canister should retain its integrity for a time of 100 000 years and the ultimate aim of the project is to show that stress corrosion cracking is not a threat to the canister integrity. The crack growth is studied as a function of applied stress intensity factor and environmental factors such as solute concentration and electrochemical potential. The approach used is to determine crack growth rates under conditions which give low but measurable rates which can then be extrapolated to times and conditions of relevance to canister integrity. The most accurate method of on-line crack growth monitoring, DC potential drop, is unfortunately in conflict with the low resistivity of copper. The results so far indicate that there is a stres.intensity threshold for SCC growth in copper which is not appreciably lower than 30 MPa√m. Additional data are needed to improve the credibility of the threshold value. It is also proposed that crack growth experiments are performed in which the environment is gradually made less aggressive in order to prove that growth stops before environmental conditions of relevance to canister integrity are reached.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Benjamin, L. A., Hardie, D., and Parkins, R. N., British Corrosion Journal, 23, 89, (1988).Google Scholar
2 Parkins, R. N., Report from University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Department of Metallurgy end Engineering Materials, March 1988.Google Scholar
3 Rosborg, B. and Svensson, B.-M., Studsvik Report STUDSVIK/M-94/73, 1994 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
4 Hietanen, S., Report No. VTT-MET B-232, Metalliilaboratorio VTT 1993.Google Scholar
5 Hänninen, H., (private communication).Google Scholar
6 King, F., Litke, C. D. and Ikeda, B. M., Corrosion 99, Paper No. 482, NACE, 1999.Google Scholar
7 Sandström, R. and Henderson, P. J., Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 246, 143, (1998)Google Scholar
8 Pettersson, K, Report No. TRITA-MAC-0594, KTH, 1996.Google Scholar
9 Suzuki, Y. and Hisamatsu, Y., Corrosion, 21, 353, (1981).Google Scholar
10 Pettersson, K and Oskarsson, M., Report No. TRITA-MAC-061 1, KTH, 1997.Google Scholar
11 Ståhle, P, Nilsson, F., and Ljungberg, L, Corrosion 88, Paper No. 281, NACE, 1988.Google Scholar