Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T14:36:57.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strengthening Porous Skeletons by Metal Deposition from a Nanoparticle Suspension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Nathan B. Crane
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave Cambridge, MA 02139
Emanuel M. Sachs
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave Cambridge, MA 02139
Andreas Frank
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

Solid freeform fabrication (SFF) processes such as three-dimensional printing (3DP) and selective laser sintering (SLS) produce porous bodies that must be densified for many applications. New homogenous infiltration techniques can produce dense, homogenous parts of selected standard alloys, but the increased infiltration temperature dramatically increases creep deflection under self-weight. This paper reports on a method that improves dimensional stability by reducing creep deflection rates at high temperature. This method is applicable to all metal skeletons that must be strengthened without increasing shrinkage. In this method, the skeletons are reinforced by the addition of nanometer-sized particles dispersed in a liquid. The liquid is applied to the structure either during 3DP printing or after forming (3DP, SLS, pressing). The liquid is then evaporated, depositing the metal in the skeleton. The metal nanoparticles are sintered to density below the sintering temperature of the micron-scale skeleton particles. This concept is demonstrated using a suspension of 8–10 nm iron particles infiltrated into lightly sintered porous steel skeletons. When heated with an unsupported overhang to a typical infiltration temperature, creep deflection was reduced 50–80% with 0.5–1 wt% added metal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Allen, S., and Sachs, E., Metals and Materials, 6, n. 6, 589 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Lorenz, A., Sachs, E., Allen, S., Raffenbeul, L., and Kernan, B., Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 35A, n. 2, 631 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Lorenz, A., Sachs, E., Allen, S., Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 35A, n 2, 641 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Kernan, B., Sachs, E., Allen, S., and Sachs, C., “Homogenous Steel Infiltration”, SME Technical Paper #TP04PUB219.Google Scholar
5. Sachs, E., Allen, S., Hadjiloucas, C., Yoo, J., Cima, M., “Low Shrinkage Metal Skeletons by Three Dimensional Printing.” Solid FreeForm Fabrication Symposium, August, 1999.Google Scholar
6. Yoo, H. J., 1997, “Reactive binders for Metal Parts Produced by Three Dimensional Printing”, SM. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 1997.Google Scholar
7. Knorr, P., Nam, J. G., and Lee, J. S., Nanostructured Materials, 12, 479 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Bourell, D. L., and Kaysser, W. A., Metallurgical Transactions A (Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science), 25A, n 4, 677 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Livne, Z., Munitz, A., Rawers, J. C., and Fields, R. J., NanoStructured Materials, 10, n 4, (1998).Google Scholar
10. Lim, L. C., Wong, P. M., and Jan, M., Acta Materialia, 48, 2263 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Markmann, J., Tschope, A., and Birringer, R., Acta Materialia, 50, 1433 (2002).Google Scholar
12. Lekhal, A., Glasser, B. J., and Khinast, J. G., Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 4473 (2004).Google Scholar
13. Vergunst, T., Kapteijn, F., and Moulijn, J. A., Applied Catalysis A; General, 213, 179 (2001).Google Scholar