Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T08:42:33.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

STRAIN AND REORDERING IN CaF2/Si(lll) EPITAXY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

SHIN HASHIMOTO
Affiliation:
Physics Department, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY 12222.
L.J. SCHOWALTER
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development Center, Schenectady, NY 12301.
W.M. GIBSON
Affiliation:
Physics Department, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY 12222.
Get access

Abstract

Strains in CaF2 films, grown by molecular beam epitaxy at 700ºC on Si(lll) subsrates, have been measured by MeV 4He+ ion channeling. For CaF2 films thinner than 200nm, the strain parallel to the (111) plane is found to be tensile. No strain is observed for films thicker than 200nm. The observed tensile strain cannot be explained by a simple pseudomorphic growth model because the larger lattice constant of CaF2 relative to Si should result in a compressive misfit strain. The tensile strain is an indication of the relaxation of the compressive misfit strain at the growth temperature due to nucleation of interfacial defects. If these defects are not annealed out as the substrate temperature is lowered after growth, the tensile strain can result because of the larger thermal contraction of CaF2 compared to Si. The final film quality near the interface improves as the film thickness is increased. This indicates that reordering of interfacial disorder is caused by the strain energy accumulated during the cooling process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Farrow, R.F.C., Sallivan, P.W., Williams, G.M., Jones, G.R. and Cameron, D.C., J. Vac. Sci. Thechnol. 19, 415 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Asano, T. and Ishiwara, H., Appl.Phys.Lett. 40, 66 (1982)Google Scholar
3.See for example, Schowalter, L.J. and Fathauer, R.W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. to be published, and references therein.Google Scholar
4. Schowalter, L.J., Fathauer, R.W., Goehner, R.P., Turner, L.G., DeBlois, R.W., Hashimoto, S., Peng, J.-L., Gibson, W.M. and Krusius, J.P., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 302 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Hashimoto, S., Peng, J.-L., Gibson, W.M., Schowalter, L.J. and Fathauer, R.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 1071 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Hashimoto, S., Feng, Y.-Q., Gibson, W.M., Schowalter, L.J. and Hunt, B.D., Nucl. Instr. and Method, to be published (Proc. of l1th Int. Conf. on Atomic Collisions in Solids, Washington, DC, 1985).Google Scholar
7. Williams, J.S., Nucl. Instr. and Method, 126, 205 (1975)Google Scholar
8. Asano, T. and Ishiwara, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 517 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ho, P.L., and Ruoff, A.L., Phys. Rev. 161, 864 (1967).Google Scholar
10. Wielunski, L.S., Hashimoto, S., and W.M.7Gibson, Nucl. Instr. and Method, to be published (Proc. of llth Int. Conf. on Atomic Collisions in Solids, Washington, DC, 1985).Google Scholar