Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T15:37:33.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Steps of Surface Etching and Carbon Deposition on the Graphite Basal Plane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Xi Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Vincent Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Lanny D. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

The reactions of O2, H2O, CO2, NO2, NO, and N2O with single crystal graphite between 400 and 700°C have been studied by STM to obtain quantitative kinetics by measuring the number and size of monolayer pits on the basal plane versus temperature and time. At low temperature the reaction initiates exclusively from the point defects on the basal plane to form monolayer pits. The shape of the monolayer pits vary from nearly triangular to hexagonal to circular depending on the rate of the reaction and the reacting gases. The sizes of the monolayer pits grow linearly with reacting time. The monolayer reaction rates follow the order of RNO2 > RN2O > RNO > RO2 > RH2O > RCO2. The activation energies for reactions with O2, H2O, NO2, NO, and N2O, are determined to be 127, 205, 60, 89, and 74 kJ/mol respectively.

Carbon deposition from hydrocarbons onto surfaces of single crystal graphite has been examined to study the fundamental steps of chemical vapor deposition. Uniform monolayer pits on graphite surface were first produced by reactive etching of freshly cleaved single crystal of graphite in oxygen and carbon was then made to deposit exclusively on these defects in the basal plane. Carbon vapor deposition forms unique structures around the monolayer steps. By measuring the sizes of structures on steps in various gases versus temperature and pressure, the kinetics of hydrocarbon decomposition and the role of surface diffusion can be determined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hennig, G. R., J. Chem. Phys. 40, 2877(1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Yang, R. T., in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon; Walker, P. L. Jr., Thrower, P. A, Eds; Marcel Dekker New York, 1984; vol 19, pp 163210.Google Scholar
3. Walker, P. L. Jr., Taylor, R. L., and Ranish, J. M., Carbon 29, 411(1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chu, X. and Schmidt, L. D., Carbon, 29 1251(1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chu, X. and Schmidt, L. D., Surface Science 29 531(1992).Google Scholar
6. Chu, X. and Schmidt, L. D., Ind. & Eng. Chem. (in press).Google Scholar
7. Chu, X., Schmidt, L. D., Chen, S. G., and Yang, R. T., J. Catal, 140,543 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ewards, H. W., AIChE Sympsium Series vol.168, 91(1971).Google Scholar
8. Chan, L. K., Sarofim, A. F., and Beer, J. M., Combustion and Flame, 52, 37(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Furusawa, T., Kunii, D., Oguma, A., Yamada, N., International Chemical Engineering, 20,239(1980).Google Scholar
10. Oblad, A. G., Davis, H. G., and Eddinger, R. T., Thermal hydrocarbon Chemistry. Advances in Chemistry series 183, American Chemistry Society, Washington, D. C., 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar