Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:23:21.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Statistical Mechanics of Phase Transitions with a Hierarchy of Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. Nihat Berker
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Robert G. Caflisch
Affiliation:
Exxon Production Research Company, P.O. Boc 21859, Houston, Texas 77252, USA
Mehran Kardar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Get access

Abstract

Rescaling (renormalization-group) [1] and restructuring [2] transformations are used in the statistical mechanics of systems with different complexities at different length scales, starting with the microscopic scale. These transformations are effected by a partial trace of the partition function, yielding effective coupling constants that incorporate the free energy contribution of the structures and length scales that are summed out of the problem. An example of this approach is a quantitative treatment [3] of the phase diagram of krypton adsorbed onto graphite. At the smallest length scales, adatom adsorption (first and second layer) and vibrations at adsorption sites are considered. At the next scale, sublattice formation and vacancy occurrence on the hexagonal graphite surface are considered. At a larger scale, heavy and superheavy domain wall formation, wall crossings and annihilations (dislocations) [4] are considered. This problem is treated by a sequence of 5 different transformations. Starting with the microscopic potentials, phase diagrams are obtained in temperature versus pressure or coverage, featuring disordered, commensurate and incommensurate solid phases, in good agreement with experiments [5]. The mechanism for reentrant phase transitions is divulged. Such solutions can be considered approximate treatments of physical systems or, alternatively, exact solutions of “hierarchical models” [6]. This “realizability” on hierarchical lattices insures the robustness of the approximation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wilson, K.G., Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174, 3184 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Berker, A.N., Phys. Rev. B 12, 2752 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Caflisch, R.G., Berker, A.N., and Kardar, M., Phys. Rev. B 31, 4527 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Kardar, M. and Berker, A.N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1552 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Specht, E.D., Sutton, M., Birgeneau, R.J., Moncton, D.E., and Horn, P.M., Phys. Rev. B 30, 1589 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Berker, A.N. and Ostlund, S., J. Phys. C 12, 4961 (1979).Google Scholar
7. McKay, S.R., Berker, A.N., and Kirkpatrick, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 767 (1982).Google Scholar
8. McKay, S.R., Berker, A.N., and Kirkpatrick, S., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 7974 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar