Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:16:37.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spectroscopic Studies of Aluminosilicate Formation in Tank Waste Simulants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Yali Su ,
Liqiong Wang ,
Bruce C. Bunker  and
Charles F. Windisch
Yali Su
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Liqiong Wang
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Bruce C. Bunker
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Charles F. Windisch
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Aluminosilicates are one of the major class of species controlling the volume of radioactive high-level waste that will be produced from future remediation at Hanford site. Here we present studies of the phases and structures of aluminosilicates as a function of sludge composition using X-ray powder diffraction, solid state 27Al and 29Si NMR, and Raman spectroscopy. The results show that the content of NaNO3 in solution has significant effects on the nature of the insoluble aluminosilicate phases produced. It was found that regardless of the initial Si:Al ratio, nitrate cancrinite was the main phase formed in the solution with pH of 13.5 and 5 MNaNO3. However, at lower NaNO3 concentration with initial Si:Al ratios of 1.1, 2.2, and 11.0 in the solutions, a range of aluminosilicate zeolites was produced with Si: Al ratios of 1.1, 1.3, and 1.5, respectively. Lowering the solution pH appears to promote the formation of amorphous aluminosilicates. The results presented here are important for the prediction of the solubility and dissolution rate of Al in tank wastes.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 465: Symposium II – Scienfific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX , 1996 , 465
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bunker, B. C., et al. , “Colloidal studies for Solid /Liquid Separations”, Chapter 7 in “Tank Waste Treatment Science: Report for the Third Quarter FY 1995”, Lafemina, J. P. Ed., Pacific Northwest Laboratory, TWRSPP-95–019, June, 1995.Google Scholar
2. Sand, L. B., Roy, Rustem, and Osbom, E. F., Econ. Geol., 52, 169–179, 1957.Google Scholar
3. Schwochow, F. E. and Heinze, G. W., Process of zeolite formation in the system in Na2O-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O, in Molecular Sieve Zeolites-I, Advances in chemistry series 101, pp. 102–108, 1971.Google Scholar
4. Senderov, E. E. and Khitarov, N. I., Synthesis of thermodynamically stable zeolites in the in Na2O-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O system, in Molecular Sieve Zeolites-I, Advances in chemistry series 101, 1971, pp. 149–154.Google Scholar
5. Barrer, R. M., Cole, J. F., and Sticher, H., J. Chem. Soc. (A), pp. 2475–2485, 1968;Google Scholar
Barrer, R. M., Cole, J. F., and Villiger, H., J. Chem. Soc. (A), pp. 1523–1531, 1970.Google Scholar
6. Barrer, R. M., Hydrothermal chemistry of zeolites, Academic press, 1982.Google Scholar
7. Engelhardt, G. and Michel, D., “High-resolution Solid-State NMR of silicates and Zeolites”, John Willey & Sons, 1987, and the references therein.Google Scholar
8. Magi, M., Lippmaa, E., Samoson, A., Engelhardt, G., and Grimmer, A. R., J. Phys. Chem., 88, pp. 1518–22, 1984.Google Scholar
9. Lippmaa, E., Magi, M., Samoson, A., Engelhardt, G., and Grimmer, A. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, pp. 4489, 1980.Google Scholar
10. Sharma, S. K., Mammone, J. F., and Malcolm, F. N., Nature, 292, pp. 140–141, 1981.Google Scholar
11. Sharma, S. K., Philpotts, J. A., and Maison, D. W., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 71, pp. 403–410, 1985.Google Scholar
12. Matson, D. W., Sharma, S. K., and Philpotts, J. A., Amer. Minerl. 71, pp. 694–704, 1986.Google Scholar
13. Nakagawa, I. and Walter, J. L., J. Chem. Phys. 51, pp. 1389, 1969.Google Scholar
14. Rousseau, D. L., Miller, R.E., and Leroi, G.E., J. Chem. Phys. 48, pp. 3409–3413, 1968.Google Scholar