Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T10:20:50.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial Damage Distribution in Electron-Beam Processed Gaas-Algaas Heterostructures, Experiment and Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Doran D. Smith
Affiliation:
U. S. Army Electronics Technology and Devices Laboratory, Fort Monmounth, NJ 07703-5000
Tobin Fink
Affiliation:
Permanent Address: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey 07102
W. D. Braddock
Affiliation:
On leave from Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

The effect of electron beam irradiation on the transport properties of HEMT structures has been studied. The data is found to agree with a model containing no free parameters which predicts the spatial extent of the damage. As grown HEMT material was fabricated into Hall bars. The material was then characterized by measurement of 2D EG number density and drift mobility. The material was then irradiated at constant dose with electron energies between 2.5 and 20 keV. Damage was assessed by changes in the number density and mobility. The number density was essentially unchanged at all energies. No change in mobility occurred for 2.5, 15, and 20 keV, however, a decrease in the mobility occurred for energies from 5.0 to 12.5 keV. These results agree with our model of the electrons energy loss as a function of its path length. The defects are shown to be charged, and possible sources of the defects are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Timp, G., Baranger, H. U., deVegvar, P., Cunningham, J. E., Howard, R.E., Behringer, R., and Mankiewich, P.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2081 (1988)Google Scholar
2 Sols, Fernando, Macucci, M., Ravaioll, U., and Hess, Karl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 350 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Smith, Doran. D., Fink, T., Braddock, W. D., and Saunders, Mary-Lloyd in The Second Workshop on Radiation-Induced and/or Process-Related Electrically Active Defects in Semiconductor-Insulator Systems, edited by Reisman, A. (Microelectronics Center of North Carolina, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1989) p. 316.Google Scholar
4 Starodubtsev, S.V. and Romanov, A. M., The Passage of Charged Particles Through Matter. (U. S. Department of Commerce, Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, VA, 1962), p. 196.Google Scholar
5 Starodubtsev, S.V. and Romanov, A. M., The Passage of Charged Particles Through Matter. (U. S. Department of Commerce, Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, VA, 1962), p 178.Google Scholar
6 The range of an electron at these energies is 50% less that the actual path length the electron travels before stopping due to straggling (a few large angle scattering events). The integration of Eq. (1) should predict the actual path length, not range, however, there is a wealth of experimental data that demonstrates theory over estimates dE/dx in this low energy range, see for example ref. 7 p 624, and references listed there.Google Scholar
7 Evans, Robley D., The Atomic Nucleus. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1955) p. 580.Google Scholar
8 Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I.M., Table of integrals. Series, and Products. (Academic Press, New York, 1965), p. 204.Google Scholar
9 Abramowitz, Milton and Stegun, Irene A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions. (Dover Publications, New York, 1965), p. 228.Google Scholar
10 Pons, D., Mooney, P.M., and Bourgoin, J. C., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 2038 (1980).Google Scholar
11 Pao, Yi-Ching, Liu, D., Lee, W. S., and Harris, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 1291, (1986).Google Scholar