Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T07:54:33.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Space Charge Contribution To Solute Segregation Near Grain Boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. F. Yan
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
R. M. Cannon
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
H. K. Bowen
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Get access

Abstract

The interaction potentials between solutes and grain boundaries in ionic solids are identified as [1] the electrostatic interaction between the charged solutes and grain boundaries and [2] the elastic energy due to size misfit of solutes in the matrix. Equilibrium solute distribution is calculated from the defect distributions leading to the minimum free energy. Space charge distributions near interfaces during kinetic processes are evaluated. We analyze the limiting case of constrained equilibrium in which the vacancy distribution and degree of solute-vacancy association satisfy a minimum free energy under the constraint of no solute redistribution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kingery, W. D., “Plausible Concepts Necessary and Sufficient for Interpretation of Ceramic Grain Boundary Phenomena,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57 [1] 18 (1974) andGoogle Scholar
ibid. 57 [2] 7483 (1974).Google Scholar
2. Gleiter, H. and Chalmers, B., High-Angle Grain Boundaries. Pergamon Press, New York (1972).Google Scholar
3. Frenkel, J., Kinetic Theory of Liquids. Oxford University Press, New York, (1946).Google Scholar
4. Kurt Lehovec, , “Space-charge Layer and Distribution of Lattice Defects at the Surface of Ionic Crystals,” J. Chem. Phys. 21 [7] 1123–28 (1953).Google Scholar
5. Eshelby, J. D., Newey, C. W., Pratt, P. L. and Lidiard, A. B., “Charged Dislocations and Strength of Ionic Crystals,” Philos. Mag. [8] (3) 7589 (1958).Google Scholar
6. Kliewer, K. L. and Koehler, J. S., “Space Charge in Ionic Crystals: I,” Phys. Rev. A 140 [4] 1226–40 (1965).Google Scholar
7. Yan, M. F., Cannon, R. M., Rowen, H. K. and Coble, R. C., “Space-Charge Contribution to Grain-Boundary Diffusion,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 60 [3–41 120127 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Cahn, J. W., “The Impurity-Drag Effect in Grain Boundary Motion,” Acta Met. 10 [9] 789798 (1962).Google Scholar
9. Yan, M. F., Cannon, R. M., Bowen, H. K. and Coble, R. L., “Grain Boundaries and Grain Boundary Mobility in Hot-Forged Alkali Halides,” pp. 549–569 in Deformation of Ceramic Materials. Edited by Bradt, R. C. and Tressler, R. E., Plenum Press, New York (1975).Google Scholar
10. Yan, M. F., “Grain Boundary Mobility of KC1,” Sc.D. Thesis, Dept. Materials Sci. and Eng., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. (1976).Google Scholar