Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T15:20:32.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silicon Microfabrication: Laser Ablation vs. Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Etch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Megan M. Owens
Affiliation:
Electronics Packaging and Prototyping Division, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
Joseph W. Soucy
Affiliation:
Electronics Packaging and Prototyping Division, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
Thomas F. Marinis
Affiliation:
Electronics Packaging and Prototyping Division, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Mechanical prototypes of a silicon interposer device, having high-aspect ratio straight walls, were required for experiments to qualify various packaging assembly options. The ideal solution would yield expendable, quickly made, and relatively inexpensive replica parts.

This need led to the investigation of micromachining of silicon via laser ablation. We sought to optimize the results by varying several parameters, the most influential of which was shown to be laser wavelength. Silicon wafers of thickness 500 νm were machined using laser wavelengths of 10,600 nm, 1064 nm, and 355 nm. As was predicted according to the theoretical silicon absorption profile, the best results were obtained using 355 nm wavelength light from an ultraviolet laser source. Several post-machining cleaning routines, to remove melted silicon debris, were evaluated as well. Pictorial results of both laser processing and cleaning are shown and discussed.

ICP was concurrently investigated as a viable alternative to laser machining. These cuts were markedly cleaner and straighter than those induced by laser; additionally, cut features were more well defined. Pictorial results are compared and contrasted with those of laser ablation.

Cost and time are traded for quality when choosing between laser ablation and ICP etch. Therefore, process choice should be application-dependent. For wafers with moderately complex cutout features, laser micromachining is significantly lower in cost and manufacturing time. However, the laser process does produce residual thermal stress surrounding the cut region, machined edges are relatively rough, and fine features are more difficult to produce. Laser ablation is an attractive manufacturing option for quick-turnaround prototyping as well as high-volume production; ICP is better suited to producing high-definition parts without potential for thermal stress damage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bosch, Robert GmbH, Pat. 4,855,017 and 4,784,720 (USA) and 4241045C1 (Germany) (1994).Google Scholar
2. Ayon, A. A., Braff, R., Lin, C. C., Sawin, H. H., and Schmidt, M. A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 146 (1) 339 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Ludwig, A., Pfleging, W. and Quandt, E. in Conference Proceedings: 6th International Conference on New Actuators, 1998, p. 367.Google Scholar
4. Palik, E. D., ed., Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, (Academic Press, Orlando, 1985) pp. 529535.Google Scholar
5. Hilgart, D., Laserage Technology Corporation, Waukegan, IL (private communication).Google Scholar
6. Hickman, D., Questech Services Corporation, Garland, TX (private communication).Google Scholar
7. Fahey, K. and Upham, S., ESI, Portland, OR (private communication).Google Scholar