Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T03:46:42.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shear Properties on Aluminum Metal Foams Prepared by the Melt Route

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

E. Saenz
Affiliation:
UTRC GmbH, Technologiezentrum, Am Europaplatz, D-52068 Aachen, Germany, SaenzE@ctaero.com
P. S. Baranda
Affiliation:
UTRC, S.L. c/o CTA Parque Tecnológico de Alava, 01510 Miñano (Alava), Spain, barandap@engl.otis.com
J. Bonhomme
Affiliation:
ITMA, Parque Tecnológico de Asturias, 33 428 Coruño-Llanera, Spain, jbonhomme@itma.es
Get access

Abstract

The shear modulus and shear strength of AISi7Mg aluminum foam with 15% (vol) of 13tm SiC particles were determined through shear testing. A foam slab with a density of 0.31 g/cm3 was supplied by Hydro Aluminium.

Four samples were tested according to ASTM C 273–61. The specimens were bonded to steel load plates. The relative displacement of the plates was measured using two extensometers. In order to evaluate the effect of the cell size distribution on shear properties, cell size and material distribution analyses were carried out for the metal foam slab in areas close to those from which the shear specimens were extracted.

A fast failure was observed after the maximum shear load. The failure in the samples were located in the central section of the slab mainly because the lower density was located there.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Davies, G. J.; Zhen, S.. J. Mat. Sci. 18, 1899 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Jin et al. US Patent No. 4 973 358 (27 November 1990)Google Scholar
3. Akiyama, S. et al. US Patent No. 4 713 277 (15 December 1987)Google Scholar
4. Wolfang, Ruch,; Walter and Kirkevag Bjorn. European Patent No. 0 483 184 (6 May 1992)Google Scholar
5. Baumeister, J.. US Patent 5 151 246 (1992). European Patent No. 0460392a1 (1996)Google Scholar
6. Kenny, at al. US Patent No. 5 281 251 (25 January 1994)Google Scholar
7. kunze, H. D., Baumeister, J., Banhart, J., Weber, M.. PMI, 25 (4), 183 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Banhart, J., Baumeister, J., M. Weber in Symposium on Automotive Technology & Automotive. Paper No. 96NM006. Florence, June, 1996 Google Scholar
9. Lorenzi, L., Fuganti, A., Todaro, E., E. Fossat in Symposium on Automotive Technology & Automotive. Paper No. 970015. Florence, June, 1996 Google Scholar
10. Ashby, M. et al. Foams database (Granta design 1996)Google Scholar
11. Gibson, L. and Ashby, M., Cellular Solids, 2ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1977) p. 197.Google Scholar
12. Simone, A.. Porous Metals and Metallic Foams. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997). PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
13. ASTM C-273–61 standard. Test Method for Shear Properties in flatwise plane of flat sandwich constructions or sandwich coresGoogle Scholar
14. Krafft Technical Document No. TT5089. 1995 Google Scholar
15. Optimas 6.1 software. Optimas Corporation. Washington, 1996.Google Scholar
16. Beals, J. T.; Thompson, M. S.. UTRC internal report. October 1996 Google Scholar
17. Asholt, P. (Hydro Aluminium private communication). March 1998.Google Scholar