Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:01:49.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Assembled β-Sheet Architectures for Bone-Tissue Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

G. Spreitzer
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 308 Mellon Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, wrightd@duq.edu
J. Doctor
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 308 Mellon Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, wrightd@duq.edu
D. W. Wright
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 308 Mellon Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, wrightd@duq.edu
Get access

Abstract

Advances in the understanding of biomineralization processes in a variety of organisms have revealed the critical role of three-dimensional scaffolding architectures to create a highly functionalized surface. These complex matrices function on a variety of length scales ranging from the macromolecular (10–100 nm) to the cellular (1–10mm) and larger. One dominant structural motif found in many of these architectures is macromolecules containing antiparallel β-pleated sheets. These “hints” from Nature have lead to the iterative design and development of a novel multipurpose platform technology based on a self-assembled periodic peptide architecture for use in bone-tissue engineering. Combining molecular modeling, structural biochemistry and synthetic techniques, we have produced a β-sheet hollow tube peptide nanoassembly. Such a synthetic approach allows for the template's designed parameters of electrostatic, geometric and stereochemical complimentarily to match those of the desired biomineral. Consequently, these templates readily nucleate calcite. Future studies will investigate the in vitro osteoconductive and osteogenic properties of these templates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Burwell, R.G., in Bone Grafts, Derivatives, and Substitutes, edited by Urist, M.R., O'Conner, B.T., Burwell, R.G., Butterworth-Heinemann LTD, Oxford, 1994, p. 3.Google Scholar
2. Mann, S., Nature 365, p. 449 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Mann, S., Archibald, D.D., Didymus, J.M., Douglas, T., Heywood, B.R., Meldrum, F.C., Reeves, N.J., Science 261, p. 1286 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Weiner, S., Crit. Rev. Biochem. 20, p. 365 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Weiner, S., Traub, W., Proc. R. Soc. B304, p. 425 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Heuer, A.H, Fink, D.J., Laraia, V.J., Arias, J.L., Calvert, P.D., Kendall, K., Science 255, p. 1098 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Bodansky, M., Bodansky, A. in The Practice of Peptide Synthesis, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, Amsterdam, (1994).Google Scholar
8. Ghadiri, M.R., Granja, J.R., Milligan, R.A., Nature 366, p. 324 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Aizenberg, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, p. 881 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Rovera, P., Quartara, L., Fabbri, G., Tetrahedron Letts. 32, p. 2639 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Fraser, R.D.B., MacRae, T.P., Stewart, H.F.C., Suzuki, E., J. Mol. Biol. 11, p. 706 (1965).Google Scholar
12. Moore, W.H., Krimm, S., Biopolymers 15, p. 2483 (1976).Google Scholar