Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T15:02:32.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Aligned Gate Metallization Processes with Low-Thermal Budget

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

X. W. Lin
Affiliation:
VLSI Technology, Inc. 1109 McKay Drive, San Jose, CA 95131
M. Weling
Affiliation:
VLSI Technology, Inc. 1109 McKay Drive, San Jose, CA 95131
Get access

Abstract

A novel concept for CMOS transistor gate metallization is described. It is featured with Gate Cloisonné, a process consisting of dielectric deposition over frontend transistors, followed by chemical mechanical polishing to re-expose the gate pattern on a planar dielectric background. Based on this concept, two metallization schemes have been developed. One is self-aligned metal gate process, which allows for low thermal budget gate metallization with element metals such as W and Al, resulting in a very low sheet resistance (< 1 Ω/sq). The other scheme is dual self-aligned silicidation, which enables decoupling of gate silicidation from that of source/drain silicon areas. Titanium based silicidation process is implemented to form thick silicide on narrow polysilicon gates and thin one over active silicon areas. Low gate sheet resistance (≈ 1.9Ω/sq) is achieved with complete suppression of linewidth effects. Both the metallization schemes are a priori scaleable to deep submicron technologies and suitable to fabricating ultra-shallow junction devices with very low gate sheet resistance. Both of them have been implemented in a 0.25-μm CMOS technology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Maex, K., Mater. Sci. Eng. Rll, 53 (1993).Google Scholar
2. 1997 National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (Table 14).Google Scholar
3. Kittl, J.A. et al., Future Fab International 2, 191 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Sakai, I. et al., VLSI Tech. Digest (1992) p. 66.Google Scholar
5. Clevenger, L.A. et al., Proc. VLSI Multilevel Interconnect Conf (1995) p. 626.Google Scholar
6. Ohguro, T. et al., IEEE Electron Dev. 41, 2305 (1994).10.1109/16.337443Google Scholar
7. Xu, D.-X. et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 404, 59 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Wakabayashi, H. et al., IEDM Tech. Digest (1996) p. 447.Google Scholar
9. Lin, X.W. et al., Chemical Mechanical Polishing '97 Proceedings, NCCA VS CMPUG Annual Meeting (San Francisco, Nov. 1997), p. 292.Google Scholar
10. Luther, B. et al., Proc. VLSI Multilevel Interconnect Conf (1993) p. 15.Google Scholar
11. Bothra, S. et al., Proc. VLSI Multilevel Interconnect Conf (1997) p. 43.Google Scholar
12. Qian, L.Q. et al., Proc. VLSI Multilevel Interconnect Conf (1997) p. 615.Google Scholar