Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T21:04:02.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self- and Dopant Diffusion in Extrinsic Boron Doped Isotopically Controlled Silicon Multilayer Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ian D. Sharp ,
Hartmut A. Bracht ,
Hughes H. Silvestri ,
Samuel P. Nicols ,
Jeffrey W. Beeman ,
John L. Hansen ,
Arne Nylandsted Larsen  and
Eugene E. Haller
Ian D. Sharp
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Hartmut A. Bracht
Affiliation:
Institut für Materialphysik, Universität Münster, D 48149 Münster, Germany
Hughes H. Silvestri
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Samuel P. Nicols
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Jeffrey W. Beeman
Affiliation:
Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
John L. Hansen
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Arne Nylandsted Larsen
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Eugene E. Haller
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

Isotopically controlled silicon multilayer structures were used to measure the enhancement of self- and dopant diffusion in extrinsic boron doped silicon. 30Si was used as a tracer through a multilayer structure of alternating natural Si and enriched 28Si layers. Low energy, high resolution secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) allowed for simultaneous measurement of self- and dopant diffusion profiles of samples annealed at temperatures between 850°C and 1100°C. A specially designed ion-implanted amorphous Si surface layer was used as a dopant source to suppress excess defects in the multilayer structure, thereby eliminating transient enhanced diffusion (TED) behavior. Self- and dopant diffusion coefficients, diffusion mechanisms, and native defect charge states were determined from computer-aided modeling, based on differential equations describing the diffusion processes. We present a quantitative description of B diffusion enhanced self-diffusion in silicon and conclude that the diffusion of both B and Si is mainly mediated by neutral and singly positively charged self-interstitials under p-type doping. No significant contribution of vacancies to either B or Si diffusion is observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 719: Symposium F – Defect- and Impurity-Engineered Semiconductors and Devices III , 2002 , F13.11
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Peart, R.F., Phys. Stat. Sol. 15 K119 (1966).Google Scholar
[2] Masters, B.J. and Fairfield, J.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 8 280 (1960)Google Scholar
[3] Fairfield, J.M. and Masters, B.J., J. Appl. Phys. 38 3148 (1967)Google Scholar
[4] Mayer, H.J., Mehrer, H., and Maier, K., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 31 186 (1977)Google Scholar
[5] Bracht, H., Haller, E.E., and Clark-Phelps, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 393 (1998)Google Scholar
[6] Ural, A., Griffin, P.B., and Plummer, J.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 3454 (1999)Google Scholar
[7] NakaBayashi, Y., Osman, H.J., Segawa, T., Saito, K., Matsumoto, S., Murota, J., Wada, K., and Abe, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39 1133 (2000)Google Scholar
[8] Ural, A., Griffin, P.B., and Plummer, J.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 4328 (2001)Google Scholar
[9] Shockley, W. and Moll, J.L., Phys. Rev. 119 1480 (1960)Google Scholar
[10] Eaglesham, D.J., Stolk, P.A., Gossman, H.-J., and Poate, J.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 2305 (1994)Google Scholar
[11] Fahey, P.M., Griffin, P.B., and Plummer, J.D., Reviews of Modern Physics, 61 289 (1989)Google Scholar
[12] Jüngling, W., Pichler, P., Selberherr, S., Guerro, E., and Pötzl, H. W., IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices ED 32 156 (1985)Google Scholar
[13] Cowern, N.E.B., Theunuissen, M.J.J., Roozeboom, F., and Berkum, J.G.M. van, App. Phys. Lett. 75 181 (1999)Google Scholar
[14] Sadigh, B., Lenosky, T.J., Theiss, S.K., Caturla, M.J., Rubia, T. Diaz de la, and Foad, M.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4341 (1999)Google Scholar
[15] Windl, W., Bunea, M.M., Stumpf, R., Dunham, S.T., and Masquelier, M.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4345 (1999)Google Scholar
[16] Antoniadis, D.A., Gonzalez, A.G., and Dutton, R.W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 125 813 (1978)Google Scholar
[17] Silvestri, H.H. et al., these proceedings.Google Scholar