Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T14:34:42.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relaxation Processes in the Electrorheological Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

P. Katsikopoulos  and
C. Zukoski
P. Katsikopoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
C. Zukoski
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Get access

Abstract

The electrorheological (ER) response is characterized by a reversible increase in suspension viscosity on application of large electric fields. Suspensions displaying this behavior are typically composed of a polar solid phase suspended in a low conductivity oil (1-3). In the past five years considerable work investigating the mechanisms controlling the ER response has established that increases in viscosity are associated with the formation of electrode spanning particulate structures which are degraded by shear (4-8). The structures are the result of polarization interactions produced by the dielectric mismatch between the solid and continuous phases. Extensive modelling studies have shown that much of the rheological behavior of ER suspensions can be understood in terms of a balance of viscous and electrical polarization forces as written in terms of the Mason number, Mn = ηc ṙ/(2ε0εc(βE)2) (9). Here ηc, is the continuous phase viscosity, ṙ is the shear rate, and E is the applied field strength. The relative polarizability of the particulate phase is given in terms of β = (εp−εc)/(εp+2εc) where εp is the particle dielectric constant and γc is the continuous phase dielectric constant. The relative viscosity of many suspensions can be reduced to a single universal function of Mason number and often display a yield stress which scales with E2.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 248: Symposium O – Complex Fluids , 1991 , 225
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1)Gast, A. P. and Zukoski, C. F., Adv. Coll. Int. Sci. 30, 153 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2)Block, H., Kelly, J. P., Qin, A. and Watson, T., Langmuir 6, 16, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3)Jordan, T. C. and Shaw, M. T., IEEE Trans. Elect. Insul. 24, 153, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4)Klingenberg, D. J., Swol, F. van and Zukoski, C. F., J. Chem. Phys. 2, 7888, (1989).Google Scholar
5)Klingenberg, D. J., Swol, F. van and Zukoski, C. F., J. Chem. Phys. 94 6160 (1991); 94 6170 (1991).Google Scholar
6)Bonnecaze, R. T. and Brady, J. F., in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electrorheological Fluids, edited by Carlson, J. D., Sprecher, A. F. and Conrad, H., Technomic Publishing, Lanchaster, PA (1990).Google Scholar
7)Bonnecaze, R. T., Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1991.Google Scholar
8)Heyes, D. M. and Melrose, J. M., Mol. Sim. 5, 293, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9)Marshall, L., Zukoski, C. F. and Goodwin, J. W., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 85, 2785, (1989).Google Scholar
10)Block, H., Kelly, J. P., Qin, A. and Watson, T., Langmuir 6, 6, (1990).Google Scholar
11)Gow, C. J. and Zukoski, C. F., J. Coll. Int. Sci. 136, 175, (1990).Google Scholar
12)Russel, W. B., Saville, D. A. and Schowalter, W. R., “Colloidal Dispersions”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
13)Anderson, R. A., to appear in the International Conference on Electrorheological Fluids: Mechanism, Properties, Structure, Technology and Applications, edited by Tao, Rongjia (Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, October 15-16, 1991).Google Scholar