Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T20:33:39.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative Activity and Selectivity of Nanoscale Mo2N, Mo2C and MoS2 Catalysts Synthesized by Laser Pyrolysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. Ochoa ,
G. T. Hager ,
W. T. Lee ,
S. Bandow ,
E. Givens  and
P. C. Eklund
R. Ochoa
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506.
G. T. Hager
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506.
W. T. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506.
S. Bandow
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Science, Myodaiji, Okazaki, 444Japan.
E. Givens
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506.
P. C. Eklund
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506.
Get access

Extract

Nanoscale and well dispersed catalyst particles offer a large number of advantages: no diffusion resistance, easy accessibility to reactants, and a large number of active sites. In coal liquefaction, highly dispersed catalysts are especially needed because the catalyst particles are only able to influence reactions within their immediate vicinity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 368: Symposium T – Synthesis and Properties of Advanced Catalytic Materials , 1994 , 27
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Derbyshire, F.J. Catalysis in Coal Liquefaction. IEA Coal Research, 1988, p. 16.Google Scholar
2. Bi, X.X., Ganguly, B., Huffman, G.P., Huggins, F.E., Endo, M., Eklund, P.C., J. Mater. Res. 8(7), 1666 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Hager, G.T., Givens, E., Derbyshire, F., ACS Prep. Div. Fuel Chem. 38(3), 1087 (1993).Google Scholar
4. O'Brien, R., Xu, L., Bi, X.X., Eklund, P., Davis, B., to be published, Appl. Catalysis, 1994.Google Scholar
5. Stencel, J., Eklund, P.C., Bi, X.X., Derbyshire, F., Catalysis Today, 15, 285 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Oyama, S. T., Kapoor, R., Sudhakar, C., Prep of Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chemistry, 37(1) 1992.Google Scholar
7. Hager, G.T., Bi, X.X., Eklund, P.C., Givens, E., Derbyshire, F., Energy & Fuels, 8, 88(1994).Google Scholar
8. Pradhan, V., Tierney, J., Wender., I. Energy & Fuels, 5, 497 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Bi, X.X., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. T. Boston, 1994.Google Scholar
10. Oyama, S.T., Schlatter, J. C., Metcalfe, J., Lambert, J., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 27, 1639 (1988).Google Scholar