Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T23:36:46.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Eco-Archaeometric Studies of Salinization and Desalinization of Karnak Temples, Egypt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

George Burns ,
K.M. Matsui ,
R.M. Potter  and
T.C. Billard
George Burns
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A1
K.M. Matsui
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A1
R.M. Potter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A1
T.C. Billard
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A1
Get access

Abstract

Earlier studies demonstrated quantitatively that recent salinization of the Karnak Temples, Egypt, is due to evaporation of saline groundwaters under the temples. Furthermore, it was determined that the high salinity of groundwaters is due to extensive evaporotranspiration over the adjacent irrigated fields. To abate salinization, in 1986, a desalinization station was installed in the central part of Karnak at Lake Amun. Present studies indicate that by 1987, the desalinization effort was already very successful, with the salinity of the Lake being lowered by a factor of more than 37. Some residual salinity was still evident a year after desalinization stations were installed. It appears that this residual salinity is due primarily to leaching of salts which were deposited around the Lake before 1986. Thus, not only the Lake, but also the area adjacent to it appear to be desalinized as a result of construction of the desalinization station.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 267: Symposium J – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III , 1992 , 903
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hodges, H.W.M. (ed.) Proc. Meeting on "In Situ archaeological conservation- 1986; MexicoCity, Instituto Nacional de Antropologic e Historia de Mexico/Getty Concervation Institute.Google Scholar
2.Review of ref. 1., European Cultural Heritage, 3 (1), 24 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Bums, George, Nature, 352, 658 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Bums, George, Matsui, K.M., Smeaton, J.E. and K.M. Wilson-Yang, Science, Technology and European Cultural Heritage, Proc. of European Synip. 1989. Baer, N.S., Sabbioni, C., A.I. Sors,Eds., Butterworth-Heinemant, Ltd., Oxford, 1991, p. 383.Google Scholar
5. Bums, George, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 17, 81, (1992).Google Scholar
6. Billard, T.C. and George Bums, Nature, 285, 654, (1980).Google Scholar
7. Bums, George, Billard, T.C. and Matsui, K.M., Nature, 344, 25 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Traunecker, C., Kdmni, 20, 195 (1970); 20, 213 (1970).Google Scholar
9. Traunecker, C., Kfmi, 21, 179 (1971).Google Scholar
10. Billard, T.C., Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto (1985).Google Scholar
11. Matsui, K.M.M., M.Sc. dissertation, University of Toronto (1990).Google Scholar
12. Mahomed, S.. “Hydrology of the Nile Basin”. N.Y., Elsevier Science, 1985.Google Scholar