Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T11:14:30.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radioelement transport in the Bangombé nuclear reactor zone (Gabon) – Evidence from U and Sm isotopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Bros R.
Affiliation:
JNC, Waste Isolation Research Division, Tokaimura, Japan
Kamei G.
Affiliation:
JNC, Waste Isolation Research Division, Tokaimura, Japan
Ohnuki T.
Affiliation:
JAERI, Department Environmental Sciences, Tokaimura, Japan
Get access

Abstract

As a natural analogue study of relevance to the safety margin of radioactive waste repository conditions, mineralogical and isotopic studies were carried out to assess the effects of the alteration of the Bangombé natural nuclear reaction zone. Mobilization and retention of reactor products were identified around the reactor. The high temperature alteration associated with the heat released during nuclear reactions lead to the partial dissolution of uraninite and the sorption of released U mostly by Al-chlorite. This was followed by the precipitation of secondary U-phases such as Zr-bearing uraninite and U-Ti oxides. The recent (<1 Ma) low temperature alteration lead to further dissolution of reactor core uraninite and mobilization of U and fissiogenic REE. Migrations took place laterally through hydraulically conductive fractures within sandstones and vertically through compacted shales, likely by diffusion-type process. Adsorption onto clays and Fe-oxides is the dominant mechanism of retention as inferred by the results of selective extraction experiments. The amounts released appear to be low compared with the quantities initially produced in the core and the transfers may have been limited within several meters around the reactor.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bros, R., Gauthier-Lafaye, F., Larqué, P., Samuel, J., Stille, P., Mat. Res. Soc., Symp. Proc., 353, 11871195, (1995).Google Scholar
2. Gauthier-Lafaye, F. and Weber, F., Economic Geol., 84, 22582267, (1989).Google Scholar
3. Yanase, N., Nightingale, T., Payne, T., Duerden, P., Radiochim. Acta, 52/53, 387, (1991).Google Scholar
4. Alysheva, E.I., Rusinova, O.V., Chekvaidze, V.B., Acad. Sci. USSR Dokl., 236, 16, (1977).Google Scholar
5. Eberly, P., Janeczek, J., Ewing, R.C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 353, 11951202, (1995).Google Scholar
6. Bros, R., Carpena, J., Sere, V., Beltritti, A., Radiochim. Acta, 74, 277282, (1996).Google Scholar
7. Bros, R., Roos, P., anderson, P., Holm, E., Griffault, L., Smellie, J., Proceedings 3rd joint EC-CEA Workshop on Oklo, 227241, (1999).Google Scholar
8. Gauthier-Lafaye, F., Holliger, P., Blanc, P.L., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 60, 48314852, (1996).Google Scholar
9. Janeczek, J., Mineralogy and geochemistry of natural fission reactors in Gabon. In Uranium: Mineralogy, Geochemistry and the Environment, Reviews in Mineralogy, Eds. Burns, P.C. and Finch, R., Min. Soc. Am., 321392, (1999).Google Scholar
10. Curtis, D. and Gancarz, A., Radiolysis in Nature: Evidence from the Oklo natural reactors (SKB/KBS No. 83–10), Sweden, (1983).Google Scholar
11. Toulhoat, P., Gallien, J.P., Louvat, D., Moulin, V., L'Henoret, P., Guerin, R., Ledoux, E., Gurban, I., Smellie, J.A.T., Winberg, A., Journal Contam. Hydrol., 21, 317, (1996).Google Scholar