Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:22:24.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pre-Yield Strain Hardening in Thermoplastics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

David C. Martin*
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan, Macromolecular Research Center, 1600 Bonisteel Blvd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Current Address: The University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Polymer Science and Engineering, 701 Graduate Research Center, Amherst, MA 01003
Get access

Abstract

Successive stress relaxation testing was used to investigate the strain hardening of polypropylene and polystyrene in the stage of deformation before yielding. By combining this information with that of a stress relaxation test it was possible to measure the change in flow stress with plastic strain or “workhardening” parameter K. K has been associated with the nucleation of “defects” of some sort which slow down the kinetics of the deformation process.

Both polymers were found to strain harden in this deformation region. In polystyrene, the amount of time need to relax through a fixed stress increment reached a plateau at a point corresponding with visible crazing in the gage section of the sample. The workhardening parameter K was determined and found to decrease with stress. By plotting the rate of change of flow stress with total strain plots were obtained which avoided the use of strain, an ill-defined parameter in materials which change state during deformation. From these plots it was seen that polystyrene exhibits a well-defined linear region at small strain whereas polypropylene deviates from linearity immediately. Hardening of polystyrene was observed even in the linear response regime.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yannas, I. M. and Luise, R. R., J. Macro. Sci.: Phys. Ed., B21 (3), 443–474 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Brown, N., J. Mat. Sci., 18, 22412254, (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Escaig, B., Polym. Eng. Sci., 24(10), 737, (1984).Google Scholar
4. Gilman, J. J., J. Appl. Phys., 44(5), 2233, (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Argon, A. S., Phil. Mag., 26, 839, (1973).Google Scholar
6. Bultel, C., Lefebvre, J. M., and Escaig, B., Polymer, 24, 476, (1983).Google Scholar
7. Guiu, F. and Pratt, P. L., Phys. Stat. Sol., 6, 111, (1964). B. L. P. Kubin, Phil. Mag., 30, 705 (1974).Google Scholar
9. Jensen, R. R. and Tien, J. K., Met. Trans. A, 16A, 10491068, (1985).Google Scholar
10. Kocks, U. F., J. Engrg. Matls. Tech. 76–85, (1976).Google Scholar
11. Voce, E., J. Inst. Metals, 74, 537562, (1948).Google Scholar