Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-21T03:47:24.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Studies of the Disposition of Cesium in a Glass-Bonded Sodalite Waste form

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Marsha J. Lambregts  and
Steven M. Frank
Marsha J. Lambregts
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory-West, PO Box 2528, Idaho Falls, ID 83401
Steven M. Frank
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory-West, PO Box 2528, Idaho Falls, ID 83401
Get access

Abstract

Argonne National Laboratory has developed an electrometallurgical treatment for DOE spent metallic nuclear fuel. Fission products are immobilized in a durable glass bonded sodalite ceramic waste form (CWF) suitable for long term storage in a geological repository. Cesium is estimated to be in the waste form at approximately 0.1 wt.%. The exact disposition of cesium was uncertain and it was believed to be uniformly distributed throughout the waste form. A correlation of X-ray diffractometry (XRD), electron microscopy (EM), and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) performed on surrogate ceramic waste forms with high cesium loadings found a high cesium content in the glass phase and in several non-sodalite aluminosilicate phases. Cesium was not detected in the sodalite phase.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 713: Symposium JJ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , 2002 , JJ11.21
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Goff, K.M., Johnson, S.G., Simpson, M.F., Benedict, R.W., Mariani, R.D., Westphal, B.R. in Proceedings of the Embedded Topical Meeting on DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile Material Management (Amer. Nucl. Soc. Proc. San Diego, Ca., 2000) pp. 58–63.Google Scholar
2. Moschetti, T.L., Sinkler, W., DiSanto, T., Noy, M.H., Warren, A.R., Cummings, D., Johnson, S.G., Goff, K.M., Bateman, K.J., and Frank, S.M. in Scientific Basis for Waste Management XXIII, edited by Smith, R.W., Shoesmith, D.W., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 608, Boston, Ma., 2000) pp. 577–582.Google Scholar
3. International Centre for Diffraction Data, Powder Diffraction File, card number 37–0476, Newtown Square, PA (1995).Google Scholar
4. Jacobsen, H.S., Norby, P., Bildsoe, H., and Jakobsen, H.J. Zeolites, 9, 491(1989).Google Scholar
5. Teerstra, D. K., Sherriff, B. L., Xu, Z. and Cerny, P. Can. Mineralogist, 32, 69(1994).Google Scholar
6. Ahn, M.K. and Iton, L. E. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 4924(1989).Google Scholar
7. Tokuhiro, T., Mattingly, M., Iton, L.E., and Ahn, M.K. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 5584(1989).Google Scholar
8. Ahn, M. K. and Iton, L. E. J. Phys. Chem. 95, 4496(1991).Google Scholar
9.RDupree, ., Holland, D. and Williams, D.S. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 81, 185(1986).Google Scholar