Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:35:43.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Population Balance Analysis of Substrate Distribution Effects on Enzymatic Reaction Rates in Reversed Micelles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. Alan Hatton
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139
Andreas S. Bommarius
Affiliation:
Organic and Biological Chemistry R&& Degussa, D-63403 Hanau, Germany
Get access

Abstract

A population balance analysis of the statistical distribution of substrates over reversed micelles indicates the importance of accounting for concentration fluctuations within the micelles in interpreting observed enhancements in enzymatically-catalysed reactions in reversed micellar media. When the reactions are slow relative to the rates of solubilizate exchange via micellar coalescence and redispersion processes, analytical solutions to the detailed population balance equations are obtained, and the connection between Michaelis-Menten kinetics in reversed micellar media and bulk aqueous solution is made. It is shown that the finite occupancy number of the micelles at low water content leads to a statistical distribution of substrates over the micelle population, and that this can give rise to changes in the apparent reaction kinetics, even in the absence of changes in the intrinsic reaction parameters themselves. The model predictions are in good qualitative agreement with reported experimental results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Luisi, P.L., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 24, 439 (1985)Google Scholar
2. Shield, J.W., Ferguson, H.D., Bommarius, A.S., Hatton, T.A., I&EC Fundam. 25, 603 (1986)Google Scholar
3. Barbaric, S., Luisi, P.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 4239 (1981)Google Scholar
4. Fletcher, P.D.I., Freedman, R.B., Mead, J., Oldfield, C., Robinson, B.H., Colloids Surf. 10, 193 (1984)Google Scholar
5. Rahaman, R.S., Hatton, T.A., J. Phys. Chem. 95, 1799 (1991)Google Scholar