Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T14:18:42.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photocarrier Recombination in Microcrystalline Silicon Studied by Light Induced Electron Spin Resonance Transients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. Müller
Affiliation:
Forschungszentram Jülich, ISI, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
F. Finger
Affiliation:
Forschungszentram Jülich, ISI, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
C. Malten
Affiliation:
Forschungszentram Jülich, ISI, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
H. Wagner
Affiliation:
Forschungszentram Jülich, ISI, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
Get access

Abstract

To get information on the density of states distribution and the photocarrier recombination in microcrystalline silicon (μc-Si:H), samples with various amounts of n- and p-type doping are studied with electron spin resonance (ESR) and stationary and time-resolved light induced ESR. The intensity of the dark ESR signals from dangling bonds (DB) and conduction electrons (CESR) is investigated as a function of the doping level. The DB signal has a flat distribution over a wide doping range while the CESR signal strongly increases with n-type doping. Upon illumination with white or infrared light both resonances are enhanced with an intensity that depends on the doping level. The decay of the light induced signal and the dependence in time and intensity of the residual signal on different initial excitation energies and dark/light -sequences is studied. The results are discussed with a schematic band diagram for μc-Si:H. The existence of a potential barrier is proposed which spatially separates photogenerated carriers. A large band-offset between crystalline and disordered regions is further suggested.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Finger, F., Malten, C., Hapke, P., Carius, R., Flückiger, R. and Wagner, H., Phil. Mag. Lett. 70, 247 (1994)Google Scholar
2.Malten, C., Finger, F., Hapke, P., Kulessa, T., Walker, C., Carius, R., Wagner, H. and Flückiger, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 358, 757 (1995)Google Scholar
3.Luysberg, M., Hapke, P., Carius, R., Finger, F., Phil. Mag. A, in press (1996)Google Scholar
4.Finger, F., Carius, R., Hapke, P., Houben, L., Luysberg, M., Tzolov, M., this conferenceGoogle Scholar
5.Stutzmann, M., Biegelsen, D.K., Street, R.A., Phys. Rev. B 35, 5666 (1987)Google Scholar
6.Bir, G.L., Butikov, E.I., Pikus, G.E., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 1467 (1963)Google Scholar
7.Neubrand, H., Phys. Stat. Sol. (B) 86, 269 (1978)Google Scholar
8.Bardeleben, H.J. v., Ortega, C., Grosman, C., Morazzani, V., Siejka, J., Stieveenard, D., J. Lumin. 57, 301 (1993)Google Scholar
9.Honig, A., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 6, 118 (1961)Google Scholar
10.Carius, R., Fuhs, W., AIP Conference Proc. 120, 125 (1984)Google Scholar
11.Backhausen, U., Hapke, P., Carius, R., Finger, F., Zastrow, U., Wagner, H., this conferenceGoogle Scholar