Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T17:49:05.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phase Transitions During Ion-Beam Irradiation of the Perovskite-structure Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. Meldrum
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Solid State Division, MS-6057, Oak Ridge, TN 37831.
L. A. Boatner
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Solid State Division, MS-6057, Oak Ridge, TN 37831.
R. C. Ewingt
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2104
Get access

Abstract

Several perovskite-structure oxide compounds, including CaTiO3, SrTiO3, BaTiO3, KNbO3, and KTaO3 were irradiated by 800 keV Kr+ ions in order to investigate and compare their response to heavy-ion irradiation. The critical amorphization temperature Tc, above which amorphization could not be induced, was found to increase in the order SrTiO3 → CaTiO3 → BaTiO3 → KNbO3 → KTaO3. No single physical parameter explains the observed sequence, although Tc correlates well with the melting temperatures. The well-known solid state phase transformations in these materials did not have a significant effect on the dose required for amorphization. Domain boundaries were observed in the pristine samples; however, after only a low dose, the boundaries became poorly defined and, with increasing dose, eventually disappeared. Dislocation loops were observed to aggregate at the domain boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bloss, F.D., Crystalloqraphy and Crystal Chemistry, Mineralogical Society of America Washington DC pp. 253–254.Google Scholar
[2] Chou, C.C. and Wayman, M., J. Mater. Res. 12, p.457 (1997).Google Scholar
[3] Weber, W.J., Ewing, R.C., and Wang, L.M., J. Mater. Res. 9, 688 (1994).Google Scholar
[4] Ziegler, J.F., TRIM Version 96.01 (IBM-Research, Yorktown, NY, 1996).Google Scholar
[5] Gemmell, D.S. and Mikkelson, R.C., Phys. Rev. B 6,1613 (1972).Google Scholar
[6] Eby, R.K., Ewing, R.C., and Birtcher, R.C., J. Mater. Res. 7, p.3080 (1992).Google Scholar
[7] Naguib, H.M. and Kelly, R., Radiat. Eff. 25, p.1 (1975).Google Scholar
[8] Ewing, R.C., Wang, L.M., and Weber, W.J., in Microstructure of Irradiated Materials, edited by Robertson, I.M., Rehn, L.E., Zinkle, S.J., and Phythian, W.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 373, Pittsburgh, PA 1995) p.347358.Google Scholar
[9] Hobbs, L.W., Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B91, p.30 (1994).Google Scholar
[10] Wang, S.X., Wang, L.A., and Ewing, R.C., in Microstructure Evolution During Irradiation, edited by Robertson, I.M., Was, G.S., Hobbs, L.W., and Rubia, T. Diaz de la (Mater. Res.Soc. Symp. Proc. 439, Pittsburg, PA 1996) p. 619624.Google Scholar
[11] Pauling, L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51, p.1010 (1929).Google Scholar