Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:06:51.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Penetrant Diffusion in Triblock Polymer by Pulse-Field-Gradient NMR and Lattice Model Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Xueqian Kong
Affiliation:
xkong@clarku.edu, Clark University, Chemistry, 950 Main St., Worcester, MA, 01610, United States
Tabitha Hargrove
Affiliation:
thargrove@clarku.eduClark UniversityChemistry950 Main St.WorcesterMA01610United States
Sara Ouellette
Affiliation:
souellette@clarku.eduClark UniversityChemistry950 Main St.WorcesterMA01610United States
Marcus V. Giotto
Affiliation:
mgiotto@clarku.eduClark UniversityChemistry950 Main St.WorcesterMA01610United States
Darryl Aucoin
Affiliation:
Daucoin@clarku.eduClark UniversityChemistry950 Main St.WorcesterMA01610United States
Gouxing Lin
Affiliation:
glin@clarku.eduClark UniversityChemistry950 Main St.WorcesterMA01610United States
Alan A. Jones
Affiliation:
AJones@clarku.eduClark UniversityChemistry950 Main St.WorcesterMA01610United States
Get access

Abstract

The three versions of poly-styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymers under investigation have different micro-scale morphologies: polystyrene (PS) spheres in poly-ethylene/butylene (EB) matrix, PS cylinders in EB matrix and EB cylinders in PS matrix. The diffusion phenomena of 2,2,4-trimethyl pentane (TMP) in SEBS probed with pulse field gradient NMR show distinct features related to the morphological characteristics. The micron scale size of grain boundaries may be obtained. In addition, the lattice model simulation was performed for the TMP diffusion in the membrane with spherical morphology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schneider, N.S., Rivin, D., Polymer 47, 3119 (2006)Google Scholar
2. Kaur, S., Florio, G., Michalak, D., Polymer 43, 5163 (2002)Google Scholar
3. Helfand, E., Wasserman, Z. R., Macromolecules 9, 879 (1976)Google Scholar
4. Helfand, E., Wasserman, Z. R., Macromolecules 11, 960 (1978)Google Scholar
5. Gido, S.P., Gunther, J., Thomas, E.L., Hoffman, D., Macromolecules 26, 4506 (1993)Google Scholar
6. Giotto, M., Lin, G., Canfield, A., Wen, W.-Y., Jones, A. A., Macromolecules 38, 99049905 (2005)Google Scholar
7. Min, B., Qui, X. H., Ediger, M.D., Pitsikalis, M., Hadjichristidis, N., Macromolecules 34, 44664475 (2001)Google Scholar
8. Callaghan, P.T., Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy, Clarendon Press, 1991 Google Scholar
9. Lin, G., Zhang, J., Cao, H., and Jones, A. A., J. Phys. Chem. B, 25, 107 (2003).Google Scholar
10. Cicerone, M.T., Wagner, P.A., Ediger, M.D., J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 8727 (1997)Google Scholar
11. Lin, G., Aucoin, D., Giotto, M., Canfield, A., Wen, W.-Y., Jones, A. A., “Lattice Model Simulation of Penetrant Diffusion along Hexagonally Packed Rods in a Barrier Matrix as Determined by Pulse-Field-Gradient Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.” to be appeared in Macromolecules Google Scholar
12. Sax, J., Ottino, J.M., Polymer Engineering and Science 23(3), 165 (1983) 0984-Google Scholar