Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:08:43.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passivating Complexes in Cd Doped G a As and InP: Microscopic Properties and Electrical Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

N. Moriya ,
M. Deicher ,
R. Kalish ,
R. Keller ,
R. Magerle ,
W. Pfeiffer ,
P. Pross ,
H. Skudlik ,
Th. Wichert  and
H. Wolf
...Show all authors
N. Moriya
Affiliation:
Physics Department and Solid State Institute, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
M. Deicher
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Germany
R. Kalish
Affiliation:
Physics Department and Solid State Institute, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
R. Keller
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Germany
R. Magerle
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Germany
W. Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Germany
P. Pross
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Germany
H. Skudlik
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Germany
Th. Wichert
Affiliation:
Technische Physik, Universität des Saarlandes, D-6600 Saarbrücken, Germany
H. Wolf
Affiliation:
Technische Physik, Universität des Saarlandes, D-6600 Saarbrücken, Germany
Isolde Collaboration
Affiliation:
CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

Perturbed Angular Correlation (PAC) and Hall measurements were used to investigate the stability of the passivating Cd-H complex in GaAs after low energy H implantation (150 eV, 1014 cm−2) at 300 K. From the observed Cd-H pair formation and reduction of hole concentration it is deduced that about 10 % of the implanted H atoms form pairs with the Cd atoms. The influence of the dopant depth profile on the apparent stability in zero bias isochronal annealing experiments is reported. After H loading a reduction of carrier mobility is observed, which is stable up to about 400 K. The formation of Cd-H pairs after low energy H implantation into InP was studied by PAC. By measuring the fraction of pairs in an isochronal annealing experiment, the stability of the pairs is deduced yielding a dissociation energy of ED = 1.8 (1) eV.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 262: Symposium E – Defect Engineering in Semiconductor Growth, Processing and Device Technology , 1992 , 431
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hydrogen in Semiconductors, edited by Pankove, J. I. and Johnson, N. M. (Semiconductors and Semimetals, vol 31, Academic Press, New York, 1991)Google Scholar
2. Hydrogen in Semiconductors, edited by Stutzmann, M. and Chevallier, J. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991)Google Scholar
3. Constant, Pr. E., in ref [2], p. 397 Google Scholar
4. Chevallier, J., Clerjaud, B., and Pajot, B., in ref. [1], p. 447.Google Scholar
5. Pfeiffer, W., Deicher, M., Keller, R., Magerle, R., Recknagel, E., Skudlik, H., Wiehert, Th., Wolf, H., Forkel, D., Moriva, N., and Kalish, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (16), 1751 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Baurichter, A., Deicher, M., Deubler, S., Forkel, D., PLank, H., Wolf, H., and Witthuhn, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2301 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Skudlik, H., Deicher, M., Keller, R., Magerle, R., Pfeiffer, W., Pross, P., and Wiehert, Th., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B63, 205 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Chevallier, J., Jalil, A., Theys, B., Pesant, J. C., Aucouturier, M., Rose, B., and Mircea, A., Semicond. Technol. 4, 87 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Biersack, J. P. and Haggmark, L. G., Nucl. Instr. Meth. 174, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Wiehert, Th., Deicher, M., Grübel, G., Keller, R., Schulz, N., and Skudlik, H., Appl. Phys. A48, 59 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gill, S. S. and Sealy, B. J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 2590 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wiley, J. D., in Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol. 10 (Academic Press, New York, 1975), p. 91.Google Scholar
13. Moriya, N. and Kalish, R., to be published.Google Scholar
14. Pearton, S. J., Corbett, J. W., and Shi, T. S., Appl. Phys. A 43, 153 (1987).Google Scholar
15. Mathiot, D. and Martin, S., J. Appl. Phys. 70 (6), 3071 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Pearton, S. J., Abernathy, C. R., and Lopata, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (27), 3571 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Baurichter, A., Deicher, M., Deubler, S., Forkel, D., Meier, J., and Witthuhn, W., Materials Science Forum 83–87, 593 (1992).Google Scholar