Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T09:21:28.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oscillatory Angular Dependence of Exchange Bias for Epitaxial NiO-Co (001) Bilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

S. Dubourg
Affiliation:
LPMC, CNRS-INSA-UPS 5830 135, 31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
J.F. Bobo
Affiliation:
LPMC, CNRS-INSA-UPS 5830 135, 31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
B. Warot
Affiliation:
CEMES-CNRS, 29 rue Jeanne Marvig 31055 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
E. Snoeck
Affiliation:
CEMES-CNRS, 29 rue Jeanne Marvig 31055 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
J.C. Ousset
Affiliation:
CEMES-CNRS, 29 rue Jeanne Marvig 31055 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
Get access

Abstract

We have sputter-deposited NiO-Co bilayers on MgO (001) substrates. NiO grows epitaxially on MgO at 900°C and subsequently the room deposited 80 Åthick Co films have a fcc crystal structure in epitaxy with the oxide underlayer. These samples were warmed up to 300° C and then zero-field or field cooled through the NiO Néel temperature (a 300 Oe magnetic field was applied along the [100] or the [110] MgO axis). Magnetic hysteresis loops were obtained by magneto-optical Kerr effect, the magnetic field being oriented in the plane of the substrate for various angles α with respect to the [100] direction. The usually expected behavior for such experiments is a smooth angular α dependence of the exchange bias HE close to a cosine with only one sign change over 180°. The high crystallographic coherence of our NiO/Co bilayers induces a very unusual oscillatory HE (α) dependence with several sign changes according to the NiO axis field application. Despite of the Co magnetization switching mechanism which is not a pure coherent rotation, we propose a Stoner-Wohlfhart model including four fold anisotropy and unidirectional exchange anisotropy giving a realistic description of these typical magnetic properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Meiklejohn, W. H. and Bean, C. P., Phys. Rev. 105, 904 (1957)10.1103/PhysRev.105.904Google Scholar
[2] Mauri, D., Siegmann, H.C., Bagus, P.S. and Kay, E., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 3047 (1987)Google Scholar
[3] Malozemoff, A. P., Phys. Rev. B 35, 3679 (1987)Google Scholar
[4] Bobo, J.F.et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 206, 118 (1999)Google Scholar
[5] Dubourg, S.et al., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 4936 (2000)Google Scholar
[6] Lai, C.H., Anthony, T.C., Iwamura, E. and White, R.L., IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 3419 (1996)Google Scholar
[7] Ambrose, T., Sommer, R. and Chien, C., Phys. Rev. B 56, 83 (1997)10.1103/PhysRevB.56.83Google Scholar
[8] Xi, H., Kryder, M.H. and White, R.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2687 (1999)10.1063/1.123937Google Scholar
[9] Warot, B.et al., submitted to Symposium O, MRS Spring Meeting 2001.Google Scholar
[10] Warot, B.et al. to be published in J. Appl. Phys.Google Scholar
[11] Dubourg, S., Hrabovsky, D., Fert, A.R. and Bobo, J.F., to be publishedGoogle Scholar