Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:50:24.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Active Volume of Cadmium Zinc Telluride Gamma-Ray Spectrometers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. C. Lund
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550
B. A. Brunett
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550 ECE Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
T. P. Viles
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550 Department of Physics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405
N. R. Hilton
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550 Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724
R. B. James
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we develop quantitative models to predict the active volume of cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detectors operated as gamma-ray pulse height spectrometers. Three cases are considered: a conventional planar detector, a unipolar device, and a detector in which electronic signal processing has been applied to correct for charge trapping effects. We find that existing detectors are very limited in their maximum attainable active volume, but unipolar devices with charge correction show promise for producing large active volume devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Akutagawa, W. and Zanio, K., Gamma Response of Semi-Insulating Material in the Presence of Trapping and Detrapping, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 40, p. 3838, (1969).Google Scholar
2. Knoll, G.F., and McGregor, D.S., Fundamentals of Semiconductor Detectors for Ionizing Radiation, Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., Vol. 302, p. 3 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Radeka, V., Low-Noise Techniques in Detectors, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., Vol. 38, p. 217, (1988).Google Scholar
4. Richter, M. and Siffert, P., High Resolution Gamma Ray Spectroscopy with CdTe Detector Systems, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A, Vol 323, p. 529 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Eisen, Y, and Horowitz, Y., Correction of Incomplete Charge Collection in CdTe Detectors, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A, Vol 353, p. 60 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Heanue, J.A., Brown, J.K., and Hasegawa, B., The Use of CdTe and CdZnTe for Pulse Counting and Current Mode Medical Imaging Applications, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A, Vol. 380, (1996).Google Scholar
7. Lund, J.C., Olsen, R., VanScyoc, J.M., and James, R.B., The Use of Pulse Processing to Improve the Performance of CdZnTe Gamma-Ray Spectrometers, IEEE Trans. Nuc. Sci, Vol. 43, No. 3, p. 1411 (1996).Google Scholar
8. He, Z., Private Communication.Google Scholar