Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T11:46:24.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observation of a New Creep Regime in Polycrystatiitne Ni-50(at.%)Al Intermetallic Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

S. V. Raj
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 49-1, Cleveland, OH 44135.
Serene C. Farmer
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 49-1, Cleveland, OH 44135.
Get access

Abstract

Constant load creep tests were conducted on fine-grained ( - 23 µm) polycrystalline Ni-50(at.%) Al in the temperature range 1000 - 1400 K. Power-law creep with an average stress exponent, n, of 6.6 and an average activation energy, Qc, of about 300 kJ mol-1 was observed above 25 MPa, while n ≈ 2 and Qc ≈ 95 kJ mol-1 for σ < 25 MPa. Primary creep was observed in both regions thereby signifying dislocation activity during the initial period of the test. Preliminary experiments with coarse-grained Ni-50A1 suggested that the rtechanism in the n = 2 region is dependent on grain size. Transmission electron microscopy observations of the deformed specimens revealed dislocation tangles, dipoles, loops and networks in the power-law creep regime. The Burgers vector was determined to be <100> with the dislocations lying on the {100} and {110} planes. Although well-defined subgrains were not always observed, there was a greater tendency towards subgrain formation at stresses above 25 MPa. The deformation microstructures were inhomogeneous in the n = 2 creep regime and many grains did not reveal any dislocation activity. The observed characteristics of the low stress region suggest the dominance of an acccanmodated grain boundary sliding mechanism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vandervoort, R. R., Mukherjee, A. K. and Dorn, J. E., Trans. ASM 59, 930 (1966).Google Scholar
2. Yang, W. J. and Dodd, R. A., Met. Sci. J. 7, 41 (1973).Google Scholar
3. Whittenberger, J. D., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 394 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Whittenberger, J. D., J. Mater. Sci. 23, 235 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Jung, I., Rudy, M. and Sauthoff, G., in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys II. edited by Stoloff, N. S., Koch, C. C., Liu, C. T. and Izumui, O. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 81, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) p. 263.Google Scholar
6. Nix, W. D. and Ilschner, B., in Strength of Metals and Alloys. Vol. 3, edited by Haasen, P., , V. Gerold and Kostorz, G. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980), p. 1503.Google Scholar
7. Coghlan, W. A., Menezes, R. A. and Nix, W. D., Phil. Mag. 23, 1515 (1971).Google Scholar
8. Frost, H. J. and Ashby, M. F., in Deformation-Mechanism Maps; The Plasticity and Creep of Metals and Ceramics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982), p. 14.Google Scholar
9. Bowman, R. R., Noebe, R. D., Raj, S. V. and Locci, I. E., Metall. Trans. 23A. 1493 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Bird, J. E., Mukherjee, A. K. and Dorn, J. E., in Quantitative Relations Between Properties and Microstructure. edited by Brandon, D. G. and Rosen, A. (University Press, Jerusalem, 1969), p. 255.Google Scholar
11. Harmouche, M. R. and Wolfenden, A., J. Testing. Eval. 15, 101 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Nathal, M. V., Ordered Intermetallics - Physical and Mechanical Behaviour edited by Liu, C. T., Cahn, R. W. and Sauthoff, G. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992), p. 541.Google Scholar
13. Hancock, G. F. and McDonnell, B. R., Phys. Stat. Sol. 4(a), 143 (1971).Google Scholar
14. Sherby, O. D. and Wadsworth, J., Prog. Mater. Sci. 33, 169 (1989).Google Scholar