Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T20:47:17.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Novel Electromigration Failure Mechanism for Aluminium-Based Metallization on Titanium Substrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

G. Girardi
Affiliation:
SGS-THOMSON Microelectronic Central R&D, Agrate Brianza, Italy
C. Caprile
Affiliation:
SGS-THOMSON Microelectronic Central R&D, Agrate Brianza, Italy
F. Cazzaniga
Affiliation:
SGS-THOMSON Microelectronic Central R&D, Agrate Brianza, Italy
L. Riva
Affiliation:
SGS-THOMSON Microelectronic Central R&D, Agrate Brianza, Italy
Get access

Abstract

In this paper a phenomenological characterisation of an anomalous grain growth, observed after classical electromigration lifetests, on Al-l%Si-0.5%Cu multigrain stripes, deposited at high temperature (460°C) on a Ti substrate, is reported. Failure analysis, carried out by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Focus Ion Beam (FIB), has detected an abnormal single-grain growth in the vertical direction, starting from the Ti/Al interface. Medium Time to Failure (MTF) data are compared with those of stripes on Ti/TiN substrate, on which no grain growth was observed. The growth of the anomalous grains has been related to the Ti/Al interface properties. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) analyses concurrently show a higher texture of the film on the Ti, compared with the film on the Ti/TiN substrate. The tight columnar orientation of grain boundaries strongly limits the mechanism of grain boundary diffusion during electromigration stress. The atomic flux is then forced to take place at the Ti/Al interface, where the epitaxial growth of the Al single grains is favoured.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Attardo, M.J., Rosenberg, R., J. Appl. Phys. 41(6), p. 2381 (1970)10.1063/1.1659233Google Scholar
2. Vaidya, S., Fraser, D.B., Sinha, A.K., Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, p. 165 (1980)Google Scholar
3. Rodbell, K.P., DeHaven, P.W., Mis, J.D., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 225, p. 91 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Sheng, T.T., Goh, G.P., Tung, C.H., Wang, L.F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15 (3), p. 610 May/Jun (1997)10.1116/1.589301Google Scholar
5. Scorzoni, A., Neri, B., Caprile, C., Fantini, F., Mat. Sci. Rep. 7 (4/5), p. 143 Dec (1991)10.1016/0920-2307(91)90005-8Google Scholar
6. Besser, P., Sanchez, J.E. Jr., Kraft, O., Mater. Res. Soc. Tutorial Symp. J, p. 88126 (1997)Google Scholar
7. Knorr, D.B., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 309, p. 75 (1993)10.1557/PROC-309-75Google Scholar
8. Cazzaniga, F., Riva, L., Queirolo, G., in Advanced Metallization and Interconnect System for ULSI Applications in 1996, edit by Havemann, R., Schmitz, J., Komiyama, H., Tsubouchi, K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Conf. Proc. ULSI XII, Boston, MA, 1996) p. 135 Google Scholar