Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T05:53:10.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Novel Detection System for Defects and Chemical Contamination in Semiconductors Based Upon the Scanning Kelvin Probe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Bert Lägel
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, AB25 1HG, UK
Iain D. Baikie
Affiliation:
Visiting Scientist, Dept. of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI
Uwe Petermann
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, AB25 1HG, UK
Get access

Abstract

A novel wafer scale detection system for defects and chemical contamination in semiconductors based upon the Scanning Kelvin Probe (SKP) is presented. It incorporates traditional work function (wf) topography with high resolution (<0.1 meV), Surface Photovoltage (SPV) measurement and the acquisition of SPV transients with time constants down to I ts. This permits quasi-simultaneous determination of surface charge, surface barrier height and bulk minority carrier lifetime. Monitoring variations of these parameters after chemical treatments give an accurate indication of the location and amount of contamination.

The SKP system is introduced and the SPV and SPV transient measurement modes are discussed. Measurements on Fe-contaminated and Au-implanted Si wafers demonstrate the feasibility of the system for defect and impurity characterisation in semiconductors. The system is both non-contact and non-destructive, requires no wafer preparation and can be applied in both ambient and vacuum environments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Roman, P., Kashkoush, I., Novak, R., Kamieniecki, E. and Ruzyllo, J., presented at the Fourth Intern. Syrp. On Cleaning Technology in Semiconductor Device Manufacturing 1995, The Electrochem. Soc. (unpublished)Google Scholar
2. Shimuzu, H. and Munataka, C., Appl. Phys. Lett 62, 276 (1993)Google Scholar
3. Zoth, G. and Bergholz, W., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6764 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Munakata, C. and Nishimatsu, S., Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 23, 1451 (1984), 25, 807 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Kamieniecki, E., Roman, P., Hwang, D. and Ruzyllo, J. in Proc. Second Intern. Symp. On Ultra-Clean Processing of Silicon Surfaces UCPSS '94, edited by Heyns, M., Meuris, M. and Mertens, P. (Acco Leuven / Amersfoort, 1994), pp. 189192.Google Scholar
6. Lagowski, J., Edelman, P., Dexter, M. and Henley, W., Semicond. Sci. Techn. 7, A185 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Edelman, P., Lagowski, J. and Jastrzebski, L. in Photo-Induced Space Charge Effects in Semiconductors, edited by Nolte, D.D., Haegel, N.M. and Gossen, K.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 261, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 223228.Google Scholar
8. Goodman, A.M., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 2550 (1961).Google Scholar
9. Ramsa, A.P., Jacobs, H. and Brand, F.A., J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1054 (1959).Google Scholar
10. Baikie, I.D. and Bruggink, G.H. in Surface Chemical Cleaning and Passivation for Semiconductors Processing, edited by Higashi, G.S., Irene, E.A. and Ohmi, T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 315, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), pp. 423428.Google Scholar
11. Baikie, I.D., Mackenzie, S., Estrup, P.J.Z. and Meyer, J.A., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 1326 (1991)Google Scholar
12. Johnson, E.O., Phys. Rev. 111, 153 (1958)Google Scholar
13. Johnson, E.O., J. Appl. Phys. 28, 1349 (1957)Google Scholar
14. Lagowski, J., Edelman, P. and Dexter, M. in Photo-Induced Space Charge Effect in Semiconductors, edited by Nolte, D.D., Haegel, N.M. and Gossen, K.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 261, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 223228.Google Scholar
15. Provencher, S.W., J. Chem. Phys. 64, 2772 (1967)Google Scholar