Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:50:23.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nmr and Mössbauer Effect Studies on Diluted Heisenberg Ferromagnets and Spin-Glasses: EuxSr1−xS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

H. Lütgemeier ,
Ch. Sauer  and
W. Zinn
H. Lütgemeier
Affiliation:
Institut für Festkörperforschung der KFA Jülich,D–5170 Jülich, W.-Germany (F.R.G.)
Get access

Abstract

The systematic variations of experimentally determined exchange and hyperfine (h.f.) interactions between Eu2+ ions are compared firstly within the EuX (X=0,S,Se,Te) series of compounds and secondly in the magnetic dilution system EuxSr1−xS. Reasonably relations can be established between the individual nearest and next nearest neighbour exchange interactions (J1,J2 ) and the transferred h.f. interactions (ΔB1 , ΔB2 ), respectively, by considering their variations with the Eu–Eu distances (R1,R2). Using these results, the measured mean hyperfine field, BI(x), and the ferromagnetic saturation h.f. field, B↑↑ (x), of the EuxSr1−xS system can be related reasonably well to the ferro- and paramagnetic phase boundaries, Tc(x) and θ (x), respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 3: Symposium – Nuclear and Electron Resonance Spectroscopies Applied to Materials Science , 1980 , 467
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Zinn, W., J. Magn. Magn. Materials 3, 23a (1976).Google Scholar
2. Sauer, Ch. and Zinn, W., Physics 86–88B, 1031 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Crecelius, G., Maletta, H., Pink, H., and Zinn, W., J. Magn. Magn. Materials 5, 150 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bohn, H.G., Fischer, K.J., Köbler, U., Lütgemeier, H., and Sauer, Ch., J. Magn. Magn. Materials, 15–18, 667 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Bohn, H.G., Zinn, W., Dorner, B., and Kollmar, A., J. Appl. Phys. (Proc. M&MM Conf. Nov. 1980, Dallas, to be published 1981).Google Scholar
6. Kojima, K., Hihara, T., Kamigaichi, T., Proc. Intern. Conf. on Ferrites Sept. 1980 Kyoto (to be published).Google Scholar
7. Hihara, T., Kojima, K., Imai, T., Fujii, H., and Kamigaichi, T., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 15–18, 665 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Maletta, H., J. Physique (Paris) 4l, C5–115 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Binder, K., Kinzel, W., and Stauffer, D., Z. Physik B36, 161 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Köbler, U. and Binder, K., J. Magn. Magn. Materials 15, 313 (1980).Google Scholar
11. Kojima, K., Komaru, T., Hihara, T., and Koi, Y., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 40, 1570 (1976).Google Scholar
12. Watson, R.E. and Freeman, A.J. in: Hyperfine Interactions, Freeman, A.J. and Frankel, R.B. eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1967) p. 53.Google Scholar
13. Sawatzky, G.A., Geertsma, W., and Haas, C., J. Magn. Magn. Materials 3, 37 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Binder, K. and Kinzel, W., private communication.Google Scholar