Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:05:49.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Tools to Control Morphology of Self-Organized Quantum Dot Nanostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

V.A. Shchukina ,
N.N. Ledentsova ,
V.M. Ustinov ,
Yu.G. Musikhin ,
V.B. Volovik ,
A. Schliwa ,
O. Stier ,
R. Heitz  and
D. Bimberg
V.A. Shchukina
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany A.F. Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
N.N. Ledentsova
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany A.F. Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
V.M. Ustinov
Affiliation:
A.F. Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
Yu.G. Musikhin
Affiliation:
A.F. Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
V.B. Volovik
Affiliation:
A.F. Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
A. Schliwa
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
O. Stier
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
R. Heitz
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
D. Bimberg
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Get access

Abstract

We consider several approaches to control morphology of self-organized quantum dot (QD) nanostructures. (i) We study effects of temperature and of temperature ramping on formation of QD arrays. The theory of equilibrium distribution of island volumes is developed predicting an entropy-driven decrease of island volume at higher temperatures. Experiments on InAs/GaAs(001) obtained both at submonolayer deposition and in Stranski-Krastanow (SK) growth mode reveal the decrease of island volume with temperature increase that agrees with the thermodynamic picture of island formation. (ii) We show a reversibility of temperature-driven changes in island volume, shape, and density for SK InAs/GaAs(001) islands and a new possibility to control QDs. (iii) We consider an advanced way of formation of complex QD structures. For multisheet arrays of strained islands a transition between correlation and anticorrelation driven by the spacer thickness is predicted theoretically and confirmed experimentally. (iv) The overgrowth of InAs/GaAs islands by an InGa(Al)As alloy leads to alloy phase separation in the capping layer and an effective increase of both the lateral size and the height of the QDs. These complex growth approaches enable us to tune efficiently electronic spectra of the QD systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 618: Symposium K – Morphological & Compositional Evolution of Heteroepitaxial… , 2000 , 79
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Bimberg, D., Grundmann, M., and Ledentsov, N.N., Quantum Dot Heterostructures, Wiley, Chichester (1998).Google Scholar
2 Shchukin, V.A. and Bimberg, D., Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, pp. 1125–1171 (1999).Google Scholar
3 Lifshits, I.M., and Slyozov, V.V., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 35 (1961).Google Scholar
4 Andreev, A.F., JETP Lett. 32, pp. 640–642 (1980).Google Scholar
5 Marchenko, V.I., JETP Lett. 33, pp. 381–382 (1981).Google Scholar
6 Vanderbilt, D., Surf. Sci. 268, pp. L300–L304 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Kern, K., Niehus, H., Schatz, A., Zeppenfeld, P., George, J., and Comsa, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, pp. 855–858 (1991).Google Scholar
8 Bressler-Hill, V., Lorke, A., Varma, S., Pond, K., Petroff, P.M., and Weinberg, W.H., Phys. Rev. B 50, pp. 8479–8488 (1994).Google Scholar
9 Ledentsov, N.N., Krestnikov, I.L., Maximov, M.V., Ivanov, S.V., Sorokin, S.L., Kop'ev, P.S., Alferov, Zh.I., Bimberg, D., and Torres, C.M. Sotomayor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, pp. 2766–2767 (1997).Google Scholar
10 Straßburg, M., Kutze, V., Pohl, U.W., Hoffmann, A., Broser, I., Ledentsov, N.N., Bimberg, D., Rose-nauer, A., Fisher, U., Gerthsen, D., Krestnikov, I.L., Maximov, M.V., Kop'ev, P.S., and Alferov, Zh.I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, pp. 942–944 (1998).Google Scholar
11 Wang, L.G., Kratzer, P., Scheffler, M., and Moll, N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, pp. 4042–4045 (1999).Google Scholar
12 Bartelt, M.C. and Evans, J.W., Phys. Rev. B 46, pp. 12675–12687 (1992).Google Scholar
13 Shchukin, V.A., Ledentsov, N.N., and Bimberg, D.. In: Self-Organized Processes in Semiconductor Alloys — Spontaneous Ordering, Composition Modulation, and 3–D Islanding. Ed. by Follstaedt, D.M., Joyce, B.A., Mascarenhas, A., and Suzuki, T.. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. V. 583. Pittsburgh, USA, 2000.Google Scholar
14 Gerthsen, D. et al. , unpublished.Google Scholar
15 Shchukin, V.A., Ledentsov, N.N., Kop'ev, P.S., and Bimberg, D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, pp. 2968–2971 (1995).Google Scholar
16 Lee, S., Daruka, I., Kim, C.S., Barabàsi, A.-L., Merz, J.L., and Furdyna, J.K.. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, pp. 3479–3482 (1998).Google Scholar
17 Madhukar, A., Chen, P., Xie, Q., Konkar, A., Ramachandran, T.R., Kobayashi, N.P., and Viswanathan, R., in Low Dimensional Structures prepared by Epitaxial Growth or Regrowth on Patterned Substrates, Proc. NATO Advanced Workshop, February 20-24, 1995, Ringberg Castle, Germany, edited by Eberl, K., Petroff, P., and Demeester, P., Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 19–28 (1995); N. Kobayashi, T.R. Ramachandran, P. Chen, and A. Madhukar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, pp. 3299-3301 (1996).Google Scholar
18 Jesson, D.E., Chen, K.M., and Pennycook, S.J., MRS Bulletin 21, p. 31 (1996); D.E. Jesson, G. Chen, K.M. Chen, and S.J. Pennycook, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, pp. 5156-5159 (1998).Google Scholar
19 Ledentsov, N.N., Grundmann, M., Kirstaedter, N., Schmidt, O., Heitz, R., Böhrer, J., Bimberg, D., Ustinov, V.M., Shchukin, V.A., Kop'ev, P.S., Alferov, Zh.I., Ruvimov, S.S., Kosogov, A.O., Werner, P., Richter, U., Gösele, U., and Heydenreich, J.. Solid State Electron. 40, pp. 785–798 (1996).Google Scholar
20 Musikhin, Yu.G. et al. , to be published.Google Scholar
21 Stier, O., Grundmann, M., and Bimberg, D.. Phys. Rev. B 59, pp. 5688–5701 (1999).Google Scholar
22 Pehlke, E., Moll, N., and Scheffler, M., 1996, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Physics of Semiconductors, Berlin, Germany, July 22-27, 1996, edited by Scheffler, M. and Zimmermann, R. (World Scientific, Singapore), Vol. 2, pp. 1301–1304 (1996).Google Scholar
23 Kaminski, A.Yu., and Suris, R.A., 1996, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Physics of Semiconductors, Berlin, Germany, July 22-27, 1996, edited by Scheffler, M. and Zimmermann, R. (World Scientific, Singapore), Vol. 2 pp. 1337–1340.Google Scholar
24 Muraki, K., Fukatsu, S., Shiraki, Y., and Ito, R.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, pp. 557–559 (1992).Google Scholar
25 Woggon, U., Langbein, W., Hvam, J.M., Rosenauer, A., Remmele, T., and Gerthsen, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, pp. 377–379 (1997).Google Scholar
26 Rosenauer, A., Oberst, W., Litvinov, D., Gerthsen, D., Förster, A., and Schmidt, R., Phys. Rev. B 61, pp. 8276–8288 (2000).Google Scholar
27 Xie, Q., Chen, P., Ramachandran, T.R., Nayfonov, A., Koknar, A., and Madhukar, A., J. Cryst. Growth 150, pp. 357–363 (1995).Google Scholar
28 Goldstein, L., Glas, F., Marzin, J.Y., Chaxasse, M.N., and Roux, G. Le, Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, pp. 1099–1102 (1985).Google Scholar
29 Ledentsov, N.N., Shchukin, V.A., Grundmann, M., Kirstaedter, N., Böhrer, J., Schmidt, O., Bimberg, D., Ustinov, V.M., Egorov, A.Yu., Zhukov, A.E., Kop'ev, P.S., Zaitsev, S.V., Gordeev, N.Yu., Alferov, Zh.I., Borovkov, A.I., Kosogov, A.O., Ruvimov, S.S., Werner, P., Gösele, U., and Heydenreich, J., Phys. Rev. B 54, pp. 8743–8750 (1996).Google Scholar
30 Xie, Q., Madhukar, A., Chen, P., and Kobayashi, N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, pp. 2542–2545 (1995).Google Scholar
31 Tersoff, J., Teichert, C., and Lagally, M.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, pp. 1675–1678 (1996).Google Scholar
32 Shchukin, V.A., Bimberg, D., Malyshkin, V.G., and Ledentsov, N.N., Phys. Rev. B 57, pp. 12262–12274 (1998).Google Scholar
33 Krestnikov, I.L., Kop'ev, P.S., Alferov, Zh.I., Straßburg, M., Ledentsov, N.N., Hoffmann, A., Bimberg, D., Rosenauer, A., Fischer, U., Gerthsen, D., and Torres, C.M. Sotomayor, Phys. Rev. B 59, pp. 8695–8703 (1999).Google Scholar
34 Holy, V., Springholz, G., Pinczolits, M., and Bauer, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, pp. 356–359 (1999).Google Scholar
35 Li, H., Wu, J., Wang, Zh., and Daniels-Race, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, pp. 1173–1175 (1999).Google Scholar
36 Liu, N., Shih, Ch.-K., and Baldenov, O., Abstract: s of the Fall-99 MRS Meeting, p. 167.Google Scholar
37 Xie, Q., Chen, P., and Madhukar, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, pp. 2051–2053 (1994).Google Scholar
38 Maximov, M.V. et al. , to be published.Google Scholar