Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T06:44:53.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Methodology For Designing Floating Ring Termination Technique In High Voltage Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

E. Stefanov
Affiliation:
LAAS - CNRS, 7, Avenue Colonel Roche, 31077 Toulouse Cedex, France, stefanov@laas.fr
G. Charitat
Affiliation:
LAAS - CNRS, 7, Avenue Colonel Roche, 31077 Toulouse Cedex, France, stefanov@laas.fr
L. Bailon
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrotechnic, University of Valladolid, 47071 Valladolid, Spain
J. Barbolla
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrotechnic, University of Valladolid, 47071 Valladolid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

A new methodology to optimise the design of Floating Ring (FR) termination technique for high voltage device is presented. The basic idea is to simulate the blocking capability of the structure with only one guard ring and then extend the results to a multiple FR system. A second advantage of our method is to include the ring width in the optimisation process. The effectiveness and efficiency of our methodology is illustrated by optimising a FR structure with a junction depth xj=5 μm and Si substrate doping 2.1014cm−3 A seven rings structure is optimized giving 90 % efficiency in respect to the ideal plane parallel junction breakdown voltage VBD =840 V. Moreover the 2D simulation program POWER2D has been extended by an efficient numerical algorithm to reduce drastically the number of iterations when adjusting the quasi-Fermi potential of the rings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Adler, M., Temple, V., Ferro, A. and Rustay, E., IEEE Trans. ED-24, pp. 107113 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Brieger, K., Gerlach, W. and Pelka, J., Solid-St. Electron. 26, pp.739745 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Boisson, V., Helley, M. Le and Chante, J., IEEE Trans. ED-32, pp.838840 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Baliga, B.J., Solid-St. Electron., 33, pp.485488 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Suh, K.-D., Hung, S.-W., Lee, K. and Kim, C.-K., Solid-St. Electron., 33, pp. 11251129 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Yasuda, S. and Yonezawa, T., Solid-St. Electron., 25, pp.423427 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Whight, K.R. and Coe, D.J., Solid-St. Electron., 27, pp.10211027 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Omura, I. and Nakagawa, A., Proc. of the 2-nd ISPSD, Tokyo, pp. 2631 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Huang, Q., Amaratunga, G., Narayanan, E. and Milne, W., Solid-St. Electron., 34, p.983(1991).Google Scholar
10. Byrne, D., Towers, M. and Board, K., IEE Proc. -G, 138, pp.109114 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Stefanov, E. and Charitat, G., POWER-2D - User's Guide, Rapport LAAS n°93306, Toulouse France, (1993).Google Scholar
12. Nolhier, N., Stefanov, E., Charitat, G. and Rossel, P., COMPEL, 13, pp.771783 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Stefanov, E., Charitat, G., Nolhier, N. and Spiesser, Ph., MRS Fall Meeting, Session E 7.2, Boston, December 1997).Google Scholar